You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently found your package which will help make my scripts shorter, but I realized that the silhouette values obtained by you were different from the ones I got. Checking your function I saw that you only use the 2 UMAP dimensions to calculate the distance.
For a given resolution, for example, with my code I get score of 0.4 and with scMiko 0.63. So I was wondering which one is the most appropriate to do.
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I recently found your package which will help make my scripts shorter, but I realized that the silhouette values obtained by you were different from the ones I got. Checking your function I saw that you only use the 2 UMAP dimensions to calculate the distance.
In codes and functions I have seen in the past they use the PCAs, instead of UMAP. Here two examples:
https://rdrr.io/github/jr-leary7/YehLabClust/src/R/ComputeSilhouetteScores.R
https://bioinformatics-core-shared-training.github.io/UnivCambridge_ScRnaSeq_Nov2021/Markdowns/08_ClusteringPostDsi.html#1212_Separatedness
In my own code, I use the harmony dimensions, as I'm integrating datasets
For a given resolution, for example, with my code I get score of 0.4 and with scMiko 0.63. So I was wondering which one is the most appropriate to do.
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: