Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Traininig with rllib #1

Open
Maxwell2017 opened this issue Mar 5, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Traininig with rllib #1

Maxwell2017 opened this issue Mar 5, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@Maxwell2017
Copy link

Maxwell2017 commented Mar 5, 2021

Hi @Miffyli , I find rllib/configs/vizdoom_ppo.yaml in your repo, is this the config that you have verified which can use ppo algo (whthin RLlib) for training vizdoom? :)

@Miffyli
Copy link
Owner

Miffyli commented Mar 5, 2021

Yes, that is the config for PPO with rllib, but note that rllib was only used to run the continuous-control experiments in ViZDoom. For other experiments it used stable-baselines here, with all the arguments being default parameters from argparse here.

@Maxwell2017
Copy link
Author

Get it ,PPO algorithm solves the problem of continuous action space,Therefore, it is not suitable to use ppo for the discrete motion space scenes such as basic and health gethering in Vizdoom.

@Miffyli
Copy link
Owner

Miffyli commented Mar 5, 2021

More or less, yes (see the paper for results). Continuous spaces seem to be much harder to learn than discrete ones, so try to avoid them.

@Maxwell2017
Copy link
Author

@Miffyli By the way, do you know the DQN training hyperparameters that can works well in other scenes of vizdoom (except basic and health gethering)? :)

@Maxwell2017 Maxwell2017 reopened this Mar 8, 2021
@Miffyli
Copy link
Owner

Miffyli commented Mar 8, 2021

Sadly no, I have mainly used A2C or PPO for ViZDoom tasks lately. I think the default parameters used for Atari games should work reasonably well out-of-the-box, though :) .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants