You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have difficulties reproducing the result reported on the EGTEA Gaze+ dataset. I'm using your provided trained weights and following the guide on code usage I get this number on different splits:
I think that the problem is the optical flow.
For the optical flow frames, I used this repository: link.
If you build it, libpydenseflow.so will be created. Then, you can use this file to extract the flow frames.
Hi and thanks for the great work.
I have difficulties reproducing the result reported on the EGTEA Gaze+ dataset. I'm using your provided trained weights and following the guide on code usage I get this number on different splits:
test_split1.txt
:acc: 36.85, 49.21 / 0:22:27
test_split2.txt
:acc: 47.65, 57.44 / 0:15:22
test_split3.txt
:acc: 50.41, 60.14 / 0:15:07
How should I reproduce 69.73%?
I'm using parameters as default:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: