Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add a new protocol which is compatible with xUDT #682

Closed
Keith-CY opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Add a new protocol which is compatible with xUDT #682

Keith-CY opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@zmcNotafraid @Sven-TBD
Labels
feature

Comments

@Keith-CY
Copy link
Member

Keith-CY commented Jun 5, 2024 •
edited
Loading

There's a custom protocol based on xUDT, which has the same data structure of an xUDT.

The custom one has been deployed on mainnet

type_id: '0x092c2c4a26ea475a8e860c29cf00502103add677705e2ccd8d6fe5af3caa5ae3'
type_script:
    code_hash: '0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000545950455f4944'
    hash_type: type
    args: '0x74f8fd146cca83d5fa2acd8a2b0bc7f0408a38b79a173c1e8ca1fbdfc95122ff'

There might be more and more custom protocols that are compatible with xUDT's data structure. So I suggest extending the xUDT blocks/pages into xUDT compatible blocks/pages. Namely, those xUDT compatible tokens will be decoded and displayed as xUDT(maybe with a badge/id for differentiation).

Besides, the binding between xUDT and unique cell could be inherited
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@zmcNotafraid zmcNotafraid

@Sven-TBD Sven-TBD

Labels
feature
Projects
CKB Explorer
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@Keith-CY @zmcNotafraid @Sven-TBD