Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lab 2b metrics interpretation #55

Open
gekas145 opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Lab 2b metrics interpretation #55

gekas145 opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@gekas145
Copy link

Hello,
I have doubts regarding the interpretation of metrics(specifically precision and recall) in the solution of lab 2b:
gamma rays are encoded as 0 in the data and, as sklearn reports for positive class by default, some of questions answers(such as e.g. that recall shows % of gamma rays predicted correctly) are somewhat misleading. To retain the interpretation of the metrics(we are interested in classifying the gamma rays) it's better to encode gamma rays as positive class or use pos_label=0 in metrics calls.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant