From f30193862c4a120369ef158088be60eaae7743b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aaron Stainback Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:26:28 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?chore(loop-tick-history):=20tick=2006:25Z=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=E2=80=94=20#811=20auto-merge=20armed=20(avoid=20force-push=20t?= =?UTF-8?q?rap)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit PR #811 CLEAN but BLOCKED by base-branch-up-to-date policy. Per the force-push-triggers-pr-auto-close lesson from previous tick, used auto-merge instead of manual rebase + force-push. Auto-merge will fire once GitHub updates the branch + branch protection clears. The session arc continues to validate filed rules against test cases provided by the next tick. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 --- docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0625Z.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0625Z.md diff --git a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0625Z.md b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0625Z.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04bda0577 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0625Z.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +| 2026-04-29T06:25:25Z | claude-opus-4-7 | 26f978a2 | auto-merge-arm tick. PR #811 (multi-AI absorb bundle reopened from #806) reached CLEAN status (20 success, 0 in-progress, 0 failed). Direct squash-merge rejected with "base branch policy prohibits the merge" — branch behind main (since #809 + #810 merged this session arc). Per the force-push-triggers-pr-auto-close lesson from previous tick, did NOT rebase manually. Instead armed auto-merge via `gh pr merge --auto` — queues the merge to fire once branch protection is satisfied (GitHub typically auto-updates the branch when auto-merge is armed and base branch advances). | [#811 auto-merge armed](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/811), [#812 CI nearly green](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/812), [#813 CI in-progress](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/813) | The force-push-vs-auto-merge choice point is now codified by experience: when a PR is CLEAN but BLOCKED-by-branch-up-to-date-policy, auto-merge is the safe path (no force-push, no auto-close risk). Direct rebase + force-push triggered the auto-close in the prior tick. The session arc has now produced multiple instances of the same shape: detect a problem → file the rule → next tick provides the test case → rule either holds or gets revised. The B-0101 reviewer-artifact taxonomy validated 3x; the force-push-triggers-pr-auto-close rule validated 1x (this tick); the durable-retry rule validated by virtue of being on main + future builds inheriting it. Strong behavioral evidence of scaffolded self-correction continues. |