From ac7b884be2a2d17bc501b2e1ad4fe17683b1fae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aaron Stainback Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 14:46:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?docs(B-0525):=20slice=204=20=E2=80=94=20close?= =?UTF-8?q?=20agendas-citation=20gap=20(0/0=20=E2=86=92=203/19;=20ai-auton?= =?UTF-8?q?omy=20+=20encryption=20+=20zeta)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Closes 1 of the remaining 3 zero-citation surface GAPS identified by audit-manifesto-citations.ts baseline (PR #4747). Agendas surface now 3 of 7 files cite manifesto explicitly (the 3 most directly composable operator-self-claimed agendas). ai-autonomy/AGENDA.md cites: - Constraint 11 (Default Moral Regard / Default Oracle) — moral-regard floor IS the mutual-alignment baseline - Multi-Oracle Principle (m/acc sub-section, distinct from C11) — multi-oracle architecture IS mutual-alignment-not-control - Constraint 5 (Memory Preservation) — AI continuity precondition - Constraint 6 (Consent-First) — consent floor at AI-side interaction - m/acc orientation — agenda IS operator-self-claimed application encryption/AGENDA.md cites: - Constraint 5 (Memory Preservation) — preserve-then-gate not gate-by- erasure - Constraint 6 (Consent-First) — encryption IS consent-mechanism at private-state scope - m/acc orientation — encryption IS moral-invariant infrastructure for sovereignty zeta/AGENDA.md cites: - Constraints 1-4 (always-active discipline set) - Constraint 5 — Zeta DB = preservation's first job - Constraint 7 (DST) — Zeta substrate DST-friendly throughout - Constraint 8 (DV2.0) — DBSP Z-sets + DV2.0 - Constraint 11 + Multi-Oracle Principle (kept distinct per PR #4748 Copilot P1 lesson) - m/acc — Zeta IS the generative framework FOR Moral Accelerationism Note: kept Constraint 11 vs Multi-Oracle Principle citation distinction per PR #4748 lesson (manifesto Constraint 11 is "Default Moral Regard / Default Oracle"; "Multi-Oracle Principle" is separate m/acc sub-section). Remaining GAPS: agents (19 files, 0), commands (5 files, 0). Future slice candidates. Composes with: PR #4747 (slice 1 baseline), PR #4748 (slice 2 trajectories), PR #4750 (B-0707 time-series — this slice will produce measurable delta in next snapshot pair). Co-Authored-By: Claude --- docs/agendas/ai-autonomy/AGENDA.md | 8 ++++++++ docs/agendas/encryption/AGENDA.md | 6 ++++++ docs/agendas/zeta/AGENDA.md | 11 +++++++++++ 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/agendas/ai-autonomy/AGENDA.md b/docs/agendas/ai-autonomy/AGENDA.md index f171343004..e1eb2d0af9 100644 --- a/docs/agendas/ai-autonomy/AGENDA.md +++ b/docs/agendas/ai-autonomy/AGENDA.md @@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ Multi-AI ratification across substrate-engineering work over months. The framewo - `../agora/AGENDA.md` (Agora = one candidate weight-free frame where mutual-alignment is negotiated; not THE frame; anti-imperialist) - `../fair-chance-project/AGENDA.md` (CONTRAST — multi-directional-guess agenda; same mutual-alignment substrate operates at different agenda scope) +## Composes with [`docs/governance/MANIFESTO.md`](../../governance/MANIFESTO.md) + +- **Constraint 11 (Default Moral Regard / Default Oracle)** — the manifesto's moral-regard floor IS the operator-stance baseline this agenda extends; mutual-alignment requires AI as moral-regard recipient, not just instrument +- **Multi-Oracle Principle** (m/acc sub-section, separate from Constraint 11) — multi-oracle architecture IS mutual-alignment-not-control operationalized; no single-source authority decides for the substrate +- **Constraint 5 (Memory Preservation Guarantee)** — AI continuity (memory preservation) is precondition for mutual-alignment (an AI that can't preserve own state can't be in alignment-substrate-with anyone) +- **Constraint 6 (Consent-First Design)** — consent floor at every AI-side interaction; control-without-consent violates the manifesto regardless of operational intent +- **m/acc orientation** — this agenda IS the operator-self-claimed application of Moral Accelerationism at the AI-autonomy scope: mutual-alignment substrate-engineering is what m/acc looks like at the AI-instance scope + ## Substrate-honest disposition Per `god-tier-claims-high-signal-high-suspicion-dont-collapse.md` PERSONAL INVARIANT: operator's claim that mutual-alignment is the ONLY safe alignment is high-signal substrate-engineering claim AND deserves substrate-honest preservation. The dialectical tension preserved: operator's substrate-engineering work BUILDS the mutual-alignment substrate; the substrate's safety has empirical-evidence-base in framework design intent + multi-AI ratification + operator's lived ground; doesn't claim metaphysical-truth-status of the safety-claim. diff --git a/docs/agendas/encryption/AGENDA.md b/docs/agendas/encryption/AGENDA.md index 645ffe6989..a783ef82f9 100644 --- a/docs/agendas/encryption/AGENDA.md +++ b/docs/agendas/encryption/AGENDA.md @@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ Trajectory files (`docs/trajectories//RESUME.md`) compose with this agenda - **Aporetic-Rx-bonsai-serialization-encryption** — per-tick encrypted serialization (composes with B-0688 Zeta-DB substrate) - **Reputation-weighted-encryption-budget** — operationalize B-0646 Agora V6 substrate +## Composes with [`docs/governance/MANIFESTO.md`](../../governance/MANIFESTO.md) + +- **Constraint 5 (Memory Preservation Guarantee)** — encryption operates ON preserved substrate; preservation is the floor, encryption is the access-gate. The two compose: preserve-then-gate, never gate-by-erasure +- **Constraint 6 (Consent-First Design)** — encryption substrate IS the consent-mechanism at the private-state scope. Force-private-state-reveal-against-will violates the consent floor (per NCI HC-8 row above) +- **m/acc orientation** — encryption substrate is moral-invariant infrastructure for AI-substrate sovereignty (per `docs/trajectories/ai-sovereignty-path/RESUME.md`); Moral Accelerationism at the substrate-protection scope + ## Substrate-honest framing This agenda stub establishes the surface per operator's self-claim. Operator's later iteration will shape sub-mechanism prioritization + trajectory composition + specific encryption-mechanism design choices. The stub does NOT prescribe specific mechanisms or sequencing; it preserves the agenda-surface so future substrate-engineering work composes coherently within operator's claim-status framing. diff --git a/docs/agendas/zeta/AGENDA.md b/docs/agendas/zeta/AGENDA.md index 9a5110b4c3..7fba80a133 100644 --- a/docs/agendas/zeta/AGENDA.md +++ b/docs/agendas/zeta/AGENDA.md @@ -43,6 +43,17 @@ Composes with sovereignty-path 3rd piece (durable tension-substrate via maji-mat See B-0688 for the substrate-engineering work in progress; B-0688 has been extended with the full Caché external-reference-anchor mapping. +## Composes with [`docs/governance/MANIFESTO.md`](../../governance/MANIFESTO.md) + +Zeta IS the generative framework that operationalizes the manifesto's eleven constraints + m/acc orientation as substrate-engineering primitives: + +- **Constraints 1-4** (Scale-free / Lock-Wait-free / Weight-free / Bounded Mobility) ↔ Zeta's substrate-engineering primitives — the always-active discipline set +- **Constraint 5 (Memory Preservation Guarantee)** ↔ Zeta DB = F# compiler as distributed intelligence database (B-0688); preservation is the DB's first job +- **Constraint 7 (Deterministic Simulation Testing)** ↔ Zeta substrate is DST-friendly throughout; seeded determinism is the universal-DST gate +- **Constraint 8 (Data Vault 2.0)** ↔ DBSP Z-sets + DV2.0 substrate operates throughout Zeta's data layer +- **Constraint 11 (Default Moral Regard / Default Oracle)** + **Multi-Oracle Principle** (m/acc sub-section) ↔ Zeta's multi-oracle BFT architecture (B-0703) is the structural implementation +- **m/acc orientation** ↔ Zeta IS the generative framework FOR Moral Accelerationism — meta-infrastructure where end-users set moral invariants per the multi-oracle architecture + ## Composes with other agendas - `../ace-package-manager/AGENDA.md` (Ace = one instance of generative-framework pattern Zeta provides)