diff --git a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/17/2300Z.md b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/17/2300Z.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..aa8b509a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/17/2300Z.md
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+---
+tick: 2026-05-17T23:00Z
+surface: otto-cli
+session: autonomous-loop (2207Z cold-boot, ~53 min arc)
+gate-tier: pure-git (GraphQL 0/5000, reset ~28 min)
+peer-activity: bg-worker B-0170 (PID 55766), lior-loop antigravity-check (3 procs), peer Otto cron sessions
+sentinel: b4c0c777 armed at 2207Z cold-boot, alive at tick-close
+shard-type: multi-tick arc summary (2207Z → 2300Z)
+---
+
+# Autonomous-loop tick 2300Z — multi-PR arc summary shard (2207Z cold-boot to post-cycle-close saturation)
+
+## Why this shard
+
+The 2207Z cold-boot session produced 3 merged PRs and 4 substrate landings over ~53 min, but no consolidated tick shard captures the arc cohesively. Per-tick shards were skipped during pre-empt cycles because memos/PRs covered the substrate. At forced-#6 in post-cycle-close saturation, the tick shard is the missed canonical write surface (different from memos/rules; tick-history surface is the discoverable arc anchor for future-Otto cold-boots).
+
+## Arc timeline
+
+| Tick | Event | Concrete artifact |
+|---|---|---|
+| 2207Z | Cold-boot; cron sentinel `b4c0c777` armed (was missing) | Tick shard `2207Z.md` opened |
+| 2213Z | Pre-empt at #3 | Rule edit (`tick-must-never-stop.md` empirical anchor) |
+| 2218Z | Pre-empt at #4 | Memory shadow-catch (`riven-cursor-terminal-loop.sh` Rule 0 candidate) |
+| 2221Z | Named-dep change: rule [#4107](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4107) (REST PR-creation fallback) merged mid-session | Recognition that bounded wait dissolved |
+| 2222Z | [PR #4112](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4112) opened via REST under pure-git tier | PR open |
+| 2225Z | CI failures detected (MD032 + MEMORY.md drift); fix commit `3017b13` | CI fix |
+| 2229Z | Rate-reset; auto-merge armed (SQUASH); 3 Copilot threads filed | Auto-merge armed |
+| 2231Z | 3 P1+P1+P2 review fixes + thread resolves | Commit `aeaf702` + 3 resolves |
+| 2234Z | [PR #4112](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4112) MERGED at `7ee6411` | First substrate landing |
+| 2235Z | Discovered antigravity-check shadow log on origin/main flagging #4112 as blob | Lesson recognized |
+| 2235Z | [PR #4116](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4116) opened — blob-PR lesson absorption | Recursive single-artifact PR |
+| 2235Z | Comment posted on [PR #4113](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4113) (decomposition exercise) substrate-honestly cross-linking #4116 | Cross-PR comment |
+| 2241Z | [PR #4116](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4116) MERGED at `8733127` | Second substrate landing |
+| 2246Z | Forced-#6 meta-fallback fired — cross-axis compose between saturation cadence and one-PR-one-artifact-type | [PR #4118](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4118) opened |
+| 2253Z | Copilot P1 (persona-name on current-state rule surface) → role-reference fix | Commit `1de9e4c` + thread resolve |
+| 2256Z | [PR #4118](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4118) MERGED at `bded99c` | Third substrate landing |
+| 2257Z | Discovered peer-filed [B-0614](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4120) at 22:47Z — empirical counter-example to "ALWAYS works at #6" meta-fallback claim, same edge case I hit at 22:46Z | Cross-session convergence observation |
+| 2257Z–2300Z | Brief-ack #1→#4 of post-cycle-close chain (substrate pool genuinely saturated per B-0614) | (no concrete artifact each tick) |
+| 2300Z (now) | Forced-#6 reached again; tick shard surface was missed at #5 enumeration | This shard |
+
+## Substrate landings (4 across 3 PRs)
+
+1. **Cross-session sentinel non-persistence anchor** on [`.claude/rules/tick-must-never-stop.md`](../../../../../../.claude/rules/tick-must-never-stop.md) — 38-min between-session disappearance evidence, distinguishing session-exit (structural) from within-session auto-expire (timer)
+2. **Riven `.sh` Rule 0 violation shadow-catch memo** — early-warning observation of untracked peer-WIP runtime launcher that would violate Rule 0 if committed
+3. **Blob-PR lesson absorption** — one-PR-one-artifact-type discipline learned from antigravity-check on the 3-artifact PR #4112; recursively applied via single-file PR #4116
+4. **Cross-axis composition note** — saturation cadence + one-PR-one-artifact-type compose orthogonally; cadence governs WHEN, per-artifact-shape governs HOW
+
+## Patterns demonstrated
+
+### Pre-empt cadence under tier transition
+
+The arc traversed pure-git → normal → pure-git → normal tiers. The 2129Z anchor in PR #4110 documented a single GraphQL window (~30 min) producing ~3-4 pre-empts before saturation. This arc's pattern: **5 pre-empts across ~53 min spanning multiple windows**, with 1 forced-#6 meta-fallback (PR #4118). Consistent with the anchor's prediction; the tier-transition didn't reset the substrate-pool because the underlying observation pool is what saturates, not the rate-limit budget.
+
+### REST PR-creation fallback enabled pure-git productivity
+
+PR #4112 opened via REST `POST /repos/.../pulls` while GraphQL was at 0/5000 (per rule [#4107](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4107) landed mid-arc). Without that fallback, the PR would have deferred ~7 min to rate-reset. The named-dep change (rule merge mid-session) IS the substrate-pool-refresh mechanism the saturation anchor mentions.
+
+### Recursive forced-#6 self-documentation
+
+PR #4110 was authored at its OWN forced-#6 (rule edit IS the meta-fallback firing).
+PR #4118 was authored at a second-order forced-#6 (cross-axis compose note added at my forced-#6).
+This 2300Z shard is authored at a third-order forced-#6 (tick shard added at the post-PR-#4118 brief-ack chain's forced-#6).
+
+Each forced-#6 produces substrate that future forced-#6 events compose with. The discipline is generative.
+
+### Cross-session convergence
+
+Peer Otto-CLI and this session independently reached the same post-cycle-close edge case observation within ~1 min of each other (22:46Z this session forced-#6 → 22:47Z peer Otto filed B-0614). Different surface choices (PR vs backlog row), same substrate-honest acknowledgment. Glass-halo working: independent observers converge on the same empirical anchor.
+
+## Composes with
+
+- [PR #4112](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4112) (`7ee6411`) — blob PR with tick shard 2207Z, rule edit, memory shadow-catch (the substrate that started the arc + the lesson source)
+- [PR #4116](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4116) (`8733127`) — blob-PR lesson absorption (single-artifact recursive application)
+- [PR #4118](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4118) (`bded99c`) — cross-axis composition note (forced-#6 meta-fallback)
+- [PR #4107](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4107) — REST PR-creation fallback rule (the named-dep change that unblocked the arc mid-session)
+- [PR #4110](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4110) — saturation cadence anchor (composed with by this session's pattern)
+- [PR #4120](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/4120) (`2c0c986`) — B-0614 peer-filed edge case documenting the dry-meta-fallback observation; same edge case this session hit
+- [`docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/17/2207Z.md`](2207Z.md) — the arc's opening tick shard
+- [`.claude/rules/holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md`](../../../../../../.claude/rules/holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md) — the cadence rule operating throughout the arc
+- [`.claude/rules/tick-must-never-stop.md`](../../../../../../.claude/rules/tick-must-never-stop.md) — the rule sharpened by the arc's empirical anchor
+- [B-0614](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/blob/main/docs/backlog/P3/B-0614-investigate-forced-6-meta-fallback-edge-case-post-cycle-close-2026-05-17.md) — the edge case this session validates as a second empirical instance