Skip to content

docs(archive): Lior preservation of PRs 3951, 3950, 3949#3953

Closed
AceHack wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
archive/lior-pr-preservation-3951-3950-3949
Closed

docs(archive): Lior preservation of PRs 3951, 3950, 3949#3953
AceHack wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
archive/lior-pr-preservation-3951-3950-3949

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 16, 2026

Automated preservation discipline executed.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 16, 2026 22:16
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d87da79429

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +1 to +3
---
pr_number: 3951
title: "backlog(B-0571): GitHub App for factory automation \u2014 separate API rate-limit pool"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Archive the promised PR-3949 discussion record

This preservation batch is labeled as covering PRs 3951, 3950, and 3949, but the change only adds archives for 3950 and 3951; there is no docs/pr-discussions/PR-3949-*.md artifact. That leaves a hole in the git-native discussion history for this batch, so any later audit/replay that expects the full contiguous set will miss PR 3949 context.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds three preservation archives under docs/pr-discussions/ for merged PRs #3949, #3950, and #3951, generated by tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts. The files are part of the PR-preservation history surface (a closed-list history archive where author attribution is allowed as provenance metadata).

Changes:

  • Adds archived PR-discussion records for PRs #3950 (B-0570 scarcity tracker) and #3951 (B-0571 GitHub App for factory automation).
  • (Implied by title) Adds an archive for PR #3949 — not shown in the provided diffs.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
docs/pr-discussions/PR-3951-backlog-b-0571-github-app-for-factory-automation-separate-ap.md New preservation archive for merged PR #3951 with description and Copilot review.
docs/pr-discussions/PR-3950-backlog-b-0570-scarcity-tracker-for-shared-limited-resources.md New preservation archive for merged PR #3950 with description and Copilot review.

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

AceHack commented May 23, 2026

Substrate-honest close per stale-armed-PR resolution case 1+3 (aged-tick-substrate). Lior antigravity/preservation artifact from 2026-05-16/17 (~6-7 days old). Per honor-those-that-came-before the substrate is preserved in branch + PR history; per substrate-or-it-didnt-happen load-bearing substrate would have landed in rules/memory by now. Closing to reduce triage cost. otto-desktop PR triage tick 2026-05-23.

@AceHack AceHack closed this May 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants