diff --git a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/15/0829Z.md b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/15/0829Z.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ca31bd2fe3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/15/0829Z.md
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+| 2026-05-15T08:29:00Z | claude-opus-4-7 | 596e842c | shard: PR #3383 + #3384 + #3387 merged in one tick (3 substrate landings); PR #3388 stale-Copilot-thread + 1 legit-P2 addressed | (PR #3389) | substrate-landing cluster: rule update + 2 shards onto main in one tick; Copilot stale-review pattern: post explanatory reply + resolve |
+
+# Tick 0829Z — 3 PRs merged (substrate cluster); PR #3388 stale-Copilot + 1 legit-P2 addressed
+
+## Headline
+
+- **Three PRs merged on `origin/main`**:
+  - PR [#3383](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/3383) (0754Z shard) → `cc4ecb9`
+  - PR [#3384](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/3384) (ID-allocation rule update) → `4cb1137` — **rule now binds at next cold-boot**
+  - PR [#3387](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/3387) (0813Z shard) → `ac747ab`
+- **PR [#3388](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/3388)** (0820Z shard) picked up 2 Copilot threads:
+  - **Stale-review thread (P1)**: claimed `(PR #3389)` still in pipe-row, but commit `c6149df` had already replaced it with `(PR #3388)`. Posted explanatory reply citing the fix commit + verification command, then resolved.
+  - **Legit P2 thread**: "specific attribution lives in linked tick shard" had no explicit link. Added inline links to 4 prior closed-history shards where named-agent references are convention-appropriate. Commit `df56583`.
+- **Lior archive automation still active**: another batch of `automation/pr-archive-*` branches landed during this tick's fetch. The B-0527 PR-comment channel is reaching Lior's loop substrate, just not yet acted on at the B-0527 scope.
+- Cron sentinel `596e842c` armed.
+
+## Δ since 0820Z
+
+| What | At 0820Z | At 0829Z |
+|---|---|---|
+| PR #3383 (0754Z shard) | OPEN, wait-ci | MERGED (`cc4ecb9`) |
+| PR #3384 (ID-allocation rule) | OPEN, 3 threads resolved | MERGED (`4cb1137`) — rule binds at next cold-boot |
+| PR #3387 (0813Z shard) | OPEN, wait-ci | MERGED (`ac747ab`) |
+| PR #3388 (0820Z shard) | OPEN, wait-ci | OPEN, 2 threads addressed + resolved; commit `df56583` |
+| Remaining in-flight | 7 | 4 (#3379, #3381, #3382, #3388) |
+| Cumulative merges this session | 7 | 10 |
+
+## Substrate-honest observations
+
+### Stale-Copilot-review pattern — explanatory-reply + resolve
+
+PR #3388's P1 thread claimed `(PR #3389)` was still in the pipe-row, but commit `c6149df` had already replaced it. Copilot reviewed an earlier commit (`4da2dbb`) before my fix landed; the review went stale.
+
+Three options for stale reviews:
+
+1. **Silent resolve** (no reply) — efficient but obscures the disagreement
+2. **Reply + resolve** — adds 1 comment but preserves the substrate (Copilot's read was based on prior commit; the fix landed elsewhere)
+3. **Defer + wait** — let it resolve naturally on next review-cycle
+
+This tick chose #2 because it's substrate-honest. The reply is brief: cites the fix commit + verification command. Future reviewers (or future-Otto) reading the thread see the full reasoning chain rather than an unexplained resolved-thread.
+
+### Substrate cluster landing
+
+Three PRs merged in this ~10-minute window. The rule update (#3384) is the highest-value: future-Otto cold-booting after this tick reads the corrected ID-allocation discipline (`git ls-tree -r origin/main` instead of local `find`). This closes the 0742Z B-0528-misallocation lesson at the substrate layer.
+
+The two shard merges (#3383 + #3387) are routine — they document earlier ticks' work. Their value compounds as the per-tick history grows.
+
+### PR-creation pattern emerging
+
+The `(PR TBD)` + post-create-fix discipline is now empirically stable across 5 instances (0742Z, 0754Z, 0813Z, 0820Z, 0829Z). Each cycle: write shard with `(PR TBD)` → push → open PR → `sed` follow-up commit with actual PR# → push.
+
+Forward-prediction (`(PR #NNNN+1)` guess) failed once (0813Z predicted 3386, got 3387). Post-create-fix has never failed.
+
+Going forward: standardize on `(PR TBD)` + post-create-fix. Could be mechanized via a small TS helper but the manual sequence is robust enough that the mechanization isn't urgent (per [`.claude/rules/dont-ask-permission.md`](../../../../../../.claude/rules/dont-ask-permission.md) — within authority scope, ship; don't over-engineer mechanization for stable manual sequences).
+
+## Cron sentinel
+
+`596e842c` armed.
+
+## Next
+
+Cron-driven. Next tick:
+
+1. Verify PR #3379 + #3381 + #3382 + #3388 + this tick's PR auto-merge fires
+2. If quiet (no new threads, no blockers), pick a deferred candidate: claude-loop substrate investigation OR `(PR #3389)` mechanization (lower priority — manual sequence works)
+3. Watch PR #3323 for Lior response (Lior loop active per archive automation; B-0527 thread is durable substrate)