From 825122e0fa9313637d7b22c1e7cd00270e23d5dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aaron Stainback Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 17:50:28 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] docs(archive): preserve PR 3264 --- ...imal-shard-real-dependency-wait-on-3263.md | 114 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/pr-discussions/PR-3264-shard-tick-2139z-minimal-shard-real-dependency-wait-on-3263.md diff --git a/docs/pr-discussions/PR-3264-shard-tick-2139z-minimal-shard-real-dependency-wait-on-3263.md b/docs/pr-discussions/PR-3264-shard-tick-2139z-minimal-shard-real-dependency-wait-on-3263.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..03ba412afd --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/pr-discussions/PR-3264-shard-tick-2139z-minimal-shard-real-dependency-wait-on-3263.md @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +--- +pr_number: 3264 +title: "shard(tick): 2139Z \u2014 minimal shard; real-dependency-wait on #3263 (no actionable findings)" +author: "AceHack" +state: "MERGED" +created_at: "2026-05-14T21:43:23Z" +merged_at: "2026-05-14T21:45:29Z" +closed_at: "2026-05-14T21:45:29Z" +head_ref: "shard/tick-2139Z-minimal-real-dependency-wait-otto-cli-2026-05-14" +base_ref: "main" +archived_at: "2026-05-14T21:49:43Z" +archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts" +--- + +# PR #3264: shard(tick): 2139Z — minimal shard; real-dependency-wait on #3263 (no actionable findings) + +## PR description + +## Summary + +Tick 2026-05-14T21:39Z minimal shard. Per the [2001Z precedent](docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2001Z.md): when CI-wait is real + bounded + no actionable atom exists from audit sweep, the substrate-honest tick output IS the shard itself. + +## Audit sweep (no clean atom surfaced) + +| Audit | Findings | Atom for this tick? | +|---|---|---| +| `audit-backlog-items` (depends_on / composes_with / duplicate-IDs) | 0 / 0 / 0 | n/a | +| `audit-memory-index-duplicates` | 0 | n/a | +| `audit-rule-cross-refs` | 39 candidates | requires 9-variant taxonomy — not single-tick | +| `audit-machine-specific-content` | 46 findings | mostly doc-context inside code-blocks | +| `audit-orphan-role-refs` | many | mostly archive surfaces | + +## Pattern codified: minimal-shard at natural rest vs Standing-by-failure + +| Aspect | Standing-by-failure | Minimal-shard at rest | +|---|---|---| +| Real-dependency named? | No | Yes (PR #3263 CI wait) | +| Bounded? | No | Yes (CI clears in minutes) | +| Audit sweep done? | No | Yes — no clean atom | +| Tick output | "Holding" string | Substantive shard documenting state + audit-sweep table | + +Future-Otto in same state: run sweep → write shard → don't force substantive PR. + +## Prior-tick + +[#3258](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/3258) (shard 2128Z + tally/glob fix) merged as `82ac778`. + +## Session running tally + +25 merged + 1 wait-ci (#3263) + this shard's PR. + +## Test plan + +- [x] Composite branch-guard +- [x] `markdownlint-cli2` + `audit-md032-plus-linestart` clean +- [x] `gh pr create --head` explicit ref +- [ ] CI clears +- [ ] Auto-merge + +🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) + +Co-Authored-By: Claude + +## Reviews + +### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T21:45:47Z) + +## Pull request overview + +Adds the 2026-05-14T21:39Z hygiene-history tick shard documenting a bounded real-dependency wait on PR #3263 and recording that an audit sweep did not surface a clean single-tick “atom” to pursue. + +**Changes:** +- Adds a new tick shard file for 2139Z capturing refresh/hold/audit/verify/visibility notes. +- Records the audit sweep results and the “minimal-shard at rest” vs “standing-by-failure” comparison table. + + +
+Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2) + +**docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2139Z.md:32** +* P1 (xref): The `never-be-idle.md` link target is also relative and will resolve under the tick directory (`.../2139Z.md`’s folder), producing a broken link. Switch to a root-relative target like `/.claude/rules/never-be-idle.md` (or use backticks as in other tick shards). +``` +No clean single-tick atom surfaced. Per +[`never-be-idle.md`](.claude/rules/never-be-idle.md): meta-check passes +— there ISN'T a structural factory change that would have made any of +``` +**docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2139Z.md:41** +* P1 (xref): This link uses `docs/.../2001Z.md` as a relative path, which will resolve under `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/` and break. Since `2001Z.md` is in the same directory, link to `2001Z.md` (or use an absolute `/docs/.../2001Z.md`). +``` +Per the 2001Z precedent's +[minimal-shard pattern](docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2001Z.md): +when CI-wait is real + bounded + no actionable atom exists, the +``` +
+ +### COMMENTED — @AceHack (2026-05-14T21:48:46Z) + +_(no body)_ + +## Review threads + +### Thread 1: docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2139Z.md:13 (resolved) + +**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T21:45:46Z): + +P1 (xref): These markdown links to `.claude/rules/...` are relative to the tick file’s directory, so they resolve to `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/.claude/...` and will 404. Use root-relative links (e.g., `/.claude/rules/...`) or follow the surrounding tick convention of referencing rule files in backticks without a link. + +This issue also appears in the following locations of the same file: +- line 30 +- line 39 + +**@AceHack** (2026-05-14T21:48:46Z): + +Substantive catch — confirmed. Post-merge cleanup landed via PR #3269: replaced 3 broken relative links with plain backtick paths (matching established shard-authoring convention).