Skip to content

fix(shard-2139Z): replace broken relative markdown links with backtick paths #3269

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2026
Merged

fix(shard-2139Z): replace broken relative markdown links with backtick paths #3269

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2139Z.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
## Holding discipline (step 2)

**Named real-dependency-wait** per
[`holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md`](.claude/rules/holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md):
`.claude/rules/holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md`:
the dependency is PR #3263 CI clearing + autoMerge firing. Not
Standing-by.

Expand All @@ -28,16 +28,16 @@ Quick audit pass on freshly-merged main:
| `audit-orphan-role-refs` | many | most in `docs/history/pr-reviews/**` (archive); active-rule citations may be false positives |

No clean single-tick atom surfaced. Per
[`never-be-idle.md`](.claude/rules/never-be-idle.md): meta-check passes
`.claude/rules/never-be-idle.md`: meta-check passes
— there ISN'T a structural factory change that would have made any of
the above into a directed task. The big residuals (`audit-rule-cross-refs`,
`audit-orphan-role-refs`) are themselves at the right shape — they
report on classes of substrate the audit can't auto-resolve.

## Work (step 3) — minimal by intent

Per the 2001Z precedent's
[minimal-shard pattern](docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2001Z.md):
Per the 2001Z precedent's minimal-shard pattern
(`docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2001Z.md`):
when CI-wait is real + bounded + no actionable atom exists, the
substrate-honest tick output IS the shard itself. This is distinct from
Standing-by-failure: the dependency is named (PR #3263), the no-new-
Expand Down
Loading