From 74aab52c27f2767544b0a8a8e6ef6b4562ca5e39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aaron Stainback Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 14:33:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix: 4 Copilot threads on PRs #3156 + #3161 (post-merge follow-up) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Both prior PRs auto-merged before Copilot threads could be addressed (advisory, not required_conversation_resolution). Fixing the 4 findings on main: PR #3156 (B-0506 row): - Frontmatter type: feature → type: chore (matches "chore(backlog)" commit prefix and avoids the friction-reducer-vs-feature semantic mismatch Copilot flagged) - Composes-with: bare filenames → full .claude/rules/ paths (unambiguous nav) PR #3161 (1822Z shard): - "~17/47" → "8/47 (~17%)" — internal consistency with lines 41 + 62 (8 rules audited) - "per per-tick" → "per-tick" (grammar nit) All 4 threads will be resolved via GraphQL resolveReviewThread mutation after this lands. Co-Authored-By: Claude --- ...stale-worktree-prune-cadence-mechanization-2026-05-14.md | 6 +++--- docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1822Z.md | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/backlog/P3/B-0506-stale-worktree-prune-cadence-mechanization-2026-05-14.md b/docs/backlog/P3/B-0506-stale-worktree-prune-cadence-mechanization-2026-05-14.md index 05ecad3051..b41567a039 100644 --- a/docs/backlog/P3/B-0506-stale-worktree-prune-cadence-mechanization-2026-05-14.md +++ b/docs/backlog/P3/B-0506-stale-worktree-prune-cadence-mechanization-2026-05-14.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ last_updated: 2026-05-14 depends_on: [] composes_with: [B-0400, B-0444] tags: [worktree, hygiene, factory-cadence, multi-foreground-surface, friction-reducer] -type: feature +type: chore --- # Stale-worktree prune cadence @@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ Wire into: - B-0400 (bus protocol — multi-Otto coordination context where this pattern manifests) - B-0444 (bus claim envelope `worktree` field — sibling discipline for claim observability) -- `claim-acquire-before-worktree-work.md` rule (the discipline this friction-reducer supports) -- `encoding-rules-without-mechanizing.md` rule (the failure mode this row addresses) +- `.claude/rules/claim-acquire-before-worktree-work.md` (the discipline this friction-reducer supports) +- `.claude/rules/encoding-rules-without-mechanizing.md` (the failure mode this row addresses) ## Substrate-honest framing diff --git a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1822Z.md b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1822Z.md index 99867ba443..e347d841df 100644 --- a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1822Z.md +++ b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1822Z.md @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Sentinel `f970cb2d` armed (every-minute `<>`). ## Visibility (step 7) -- **Landed this tick**: razor-cadence item 4 batch 2 — 37/37 cross-references LIVE across 4 more rules. Combined with batch 1: 67/67 LIVE across 8 rules. ~17/47 total `.claude/rules/` files now have a clean composes-with audit pass. +- **Landed this tick**: razor-cadence item 4 batch 2 — 37/37 cross-references LIVE across 4 more rules. Combined with batch 1: 67/67 LIVE across 8 rules. 8/47 (~17%) total `.claude/rules/` files now have a clean composes-with audit pass. - **Open PRs**: only #3156 (this session) wait-ci → next ETA in poll-pr-gate cycle. ## Notes for future-Otto @@ -59,4 +59,4 @@ Both batches reveal a clean memory-file ecosystem: every cited `memory/feedback_ **Distinction worth carrying**: when §33 research archives reference memory files, the convention is to clarify user-scope explicitly (per PR #3150 1808Z fix). When `.claude/rules/` files reference memory files, the `memory/` prefix implicitly means repo-scope (per this batch's audit — 13/13 LIVE confirms the convention). -**Razor-cadence item 4 status**: 8/47 rules audited (~17% coverage). At ~4 rules per per-tick audit batch, completing item 4 would take ~10 more batches. Razor-cadence cluster of items 1+2+3+5 (per the original #3128 checklist) require deeper read of rule contents and remain for future ticks. +**Razor-cadence item 4 status**: 8/47 rules audited (~17% coverage). At ~4 rules per-tick audit batch, completing item 4 would take ~10 more batches. Razor-cadence cluster of items 1+2+3+5 (per the original #3128 checklist) require deeper read of rule contents and remain for future ticks.