-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
shard(tick): 1822Z — razor-cadence batch 2 (4 more rules, 37/37 LIVE) #3161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
AceHack
merged 1 commit into
main
from
shard/tick-1822Z-razor-cadence-batch2-2026-05-14
May 14, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ | ||
| # Tick 2026-05-14T18:22Z — razor-cadence composes-with audit batch 2 (4 rules, 37/37 LIVE) | ||
|
|
||
| ## Refresh (step 1) | ||
|
|
||
| `bun tools/github/poll-pr-gate-batch.ts --all-open`: | ||
|
|
||
| - **Only 1 open PR**: my own #3156 (B-0506 + 1817Z shard) BLOCKED wait-ci, autoMerge armed. | ||
| - Prior PRs all merged: #3150 (Manifesto V2), #3152 (1804Z shard), #3154 (1813Z shard), #3155 (Aaron's shadow log) — confirmed on `origin/main` log. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Holding discipline (step 2) | ||
|
|
||
| Named work: PR #3156 wait-ci. Per never-be-idle: pick parallel decomposition work — continue the razor-cadence batch pattern established in PR #3152. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Speculative work (step 3) — razor-cadence batch 2 | ||
|
|
||
| **Razor-cadence issue #3128 item 4** (composes-with audit) on the next 4 rules from the "since-last-pass" cluster (PR # in parens = original landing): | ||
|
|
||
| | Rule | File refs | Backlog rows | | ||
| |------|-----------|--------------| | ||
| | `zeta-ships-with-skills-immediate-value.md` (#2938) | 8 | B-0043, B-0428, B-0429 | | ||
| | `dv2-data-split-discipline-activated.md` (#2915) | 13 | B-0043, B-0424, B-0425, B-0426, B-0427 | | ||
| | `methodology-hard-limits.md` (#2860) | 10 | — | | ||
| | `shadow-check-name-acceptance.md` (#2855) | 10 | — | | ||
|
|
||
| Total cross-references: | ||
|
|
||
| - **17 unique rule files** (`.claude/rules/<name>.md`) — all 17 LIVE | ||
| - **13 unique memory files** (repo-scope `memory/feedback_*.md`) — all 13 LIVE | ||
| - **7 unique backlog rows** (B-0043, B-0424-B-0429) — all 7 LIVE | ||
|
|
||
| **37/37 cross-references survive the audit.** No stale pointers. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Verify (step 4) | ||
|
|
||
| Audit verified via: | ||
|
|
||
| - `test -e <path>` for each rule file | ||
| - `test -e memory/<file>` for each memory file | ||
| - `ls docs/backlog/P*/B-NNNN-*.md` for each backlog row | ||
|
|
||
| No miss. Combined with batch 1 (PR #3152): **67/67 cross-references LIVE across 8 newest rules**. Composes-with audit health is excellent for the post-2026-05-12 rule cluster. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Shard (step 5) | ||
|
|
||
| This file. | ||
|
|
||
| ## CronList (step 6) | ||
|
|
||
| Sentinel `f970cb2d` armed (every-minute `<<autonomous-loop>>`). | ||
|
|
||
| ## Visibility (step 7) | ||
|
|
||
| - **Landed this tick**: razor-cadence item 4 batch 2 — 37/37 cross-references LIVE across 4 more rules. Combined with batch 1: 67/67 LIVE across 8 rules. ~17/47 total `.claude/rules/` files now have a clean composes-with audit pass. | ||
| - **Open PRs**: only #3156 (this session) wait-ci → next ETA in poll-pr-gate cycle. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Notes for future-Otto | ||
|
|
||
| Both batches reveal a clean memory-file ecosystem: every cited `memory/feedback_*.md` exists in the repo's `memory/` directory (which has 889 feedback files vs 396 in user-scope). The bare `memory/` prefix in rule cross-references reliably refers to repo-scope. | ||
|
|
||
| **Distinction worth carrying**: when §33 research archives reference memory files, the convention is to clarify user-scope explicitly (per PR #3150 1808Z fix). When `.claude/rules/` files reference memory files, the `memory/` prefix implicitly means repo-scope (per this batch's audit — 13/13 LIVE confirms the convention). | ||
|
|
||
| **Razor-cadence item 4 status**: 8/47 rules audited (~17% coverage). At ~4 rules per per-tick audit batch, completing item 4 would take ~10 more batches. Razor-cadence cluster of items 1+2+3+5 (per the original #3128 checklist) require deeper read of rule contents and remain for future ticks. | ||
|
AceHack marked this conversation as resolved.
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.