diff --git a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/0052Z.md b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/0052Z.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..287c7efaec --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/0052Z.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +--- +tick: 2026-05-14T00:52Z +agent: otto-cli +session: autonomous-loop cron sentinel (cold-boot) +pr: 3074 +--- + +# Tick 0052Z — PR #3074 reviewer-thread fixes already landed by concurrent tick + +## Refresh + +- `git status`: clean working tree on main +- `bun tools/github/refresh-worldview.ts`: 2 open PRs (#3074, #3075), 5 recent + merges, 561 backlog items +- `bun tools/github/poll-pr-gate-batch.ts --all-open`: + - #3075 (B-0456 MD032 helper): `gate=BLOCKED, nextAction=wait-ci`, + auto-merge armed, 0 unresolved threads — **real-dependency-wait on CI** + - #3074 (B-0145 PM-2 forward-radar scaffold): `gate=BLOCKED, + nextAction=fix-failed-checks`, auto-merge armed, **4 unresolved threads, + required-checks failed=2** — actionable + +## Holding-discipline applied + +Per `.claude/rules/holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md`: +PR #3074 was actionable (not a hold), PR #3075 was real-dependency-wait on +specific CI completion. Picked PR #3074 for substantive work. + +## Step 4 — discovered concurrent landing + +Reviewer findings on PR #3074: + +1. `docs/forward-radar/calibration.md:53` — zero-denominator behaviour for + `Lead-time%` / `Action-rate%` undefined +2. `docs/forward-radar/calibration.md:23` — persona-name attribution + "PM-1 (Otto)" + "how many Otto picked up" on current-state surface +3. `docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md:51` — persona names (`PM-2 / Mira`, + `author: pm2 (Mira)`, `Mira predicts, Otto delivers`, `Updated by Mira`) +4. `docs/backlog/P1/B-0145-...md:16` — `last_updated` not bumped from 2026-05-02 + +Plus required-check failure: `lint (markdownlint)` MD032 blanks-around-lists +on B-0145 row lines 19, 26, 31. + +Non-required failures (infrastructure-flaky): `lint (no conflict markers)`, +`lint (archive header §33)`, `lint (no empty dirs)`, `lint (semgrep)`, +`Analyze (csharp|java-kotlin|javascript-typescript)`, `Path gate` — all +caused by GitHub API rate-limit during `mise` install of +`astral-sh/uv@0.11.8`, `koalaman/shellcheck@0.11.0`, `rhysd/actionlint@1.7.12`, +`semgrep@1.161.0`. These will pass on next CI re-run. + +Worktree `/private/tmp/zeta-b0145-fixes` (registered worktree on branch +`feat/pm2-forward-radar-b0145-2026-05-13`) was already showing all the fixes +in the working tree from a prior autonomous-loop tick. While I was preparing +to stage + commit, a concurrent tick committed and pushed +[d448420](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/commit/d448420) +`fix(pm2/b-0145): address PR #3074 review findings (4 threads)`. + +Working tree returned to clean, HEAD == origin. **No action needed by this +tick.** This is the multi-foreground-surface architecture operating as +designed: two parallel ticks both saw the same work; the faster one +committed; the slower one (this tick) finds it already done. + +## Cron check + +`CronList` at session-start showed no scheduled jobs. Armed sentinel via +`CronCreate cron="* * * * *" prompt="<>" recurring=true` +→ job ID `81c5e1a9`. Per `.claude/rules/tick-must-never-stop.md` catch-43 +discipline. + +## Holding status (post-landing) + +Both PRs now have named dependencies with bounded ETA: + +- **#3074**: real-dependency-wait on CI re-running against commit + `d448420` (~5min ETA for required checks); semgrep + markdownlint expected + to pass now +- **#3075**: real-dependency-wait on CI completion (in-progress, ~5min ETA) + +Per holding-without-named-dependency discipline: this is **legitimate** held +state, not the failure-mode "Holding" output. + +## Substrate landings + +- Cron sentinel armed (catch-43) +- Tick shard written (this file) + +## What next tick should check + +- PR #3074 CI re-run status after `d448420` +- PR #3075 CI completion +- If both PRs merge cleanly: pick next P0/P1 actionable from + `bun tools/github/refresh-worldview.ts` open-issues list +- If either PR fails CI again on required checks: investigate the + specific failure (not the rate-limit infrastructure noise)