diff --git a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/01/0651Z.md b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/01/0651Z.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b8f8be6cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/01/0651Z.md
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+| 2026-05-01T06:51:00Z | opus-4-7 / autonomous-loop tick | 98fc7424 | Drain tick on PR #1030 + PR #986 — both BLOCKED+green-CI/blocker. **PR #1030** (manufactured-patience refinement): "check memory/MEMORY.md paired edit" CI was failing because PR modified `memory/feedback_manufactured_patience_vs_real_dependency_wait_otto_distinction_2026_04_26.md` without updating MEMORY.md. Root cause: file was forward-ported from AceHack in dfb49e5 (#663 forward-port batch) but never indexed in MEMORY.md (task #291 backfill gap). Fix: added terse one-line MEMORY.md entry per memory/README.md convention with paired-edit comment marker. **PR #986** (carved-sentence + Deepseek absorption): drained 6 unresolved review threads across 2 finding classes: (1) **Multiple latest-paired-edit markers** — line 4 carried a duplicate `latest-paired-edit:` comment alongside line 3's, violating the comment's own self-described single-slot semantic. Converted line 4 to a `paired-edit log` comment that explicitly references line 3 as the actual latest-marker (forever-home Aaron 2026-05-01 takes precedence as chronologically latest). (2) **"six-message" / "eight-message" chain mismatch** — index entry said "six-message chain" but file body's section header says "## The eight-message chain (Aaron 2026-04-30, extended 2026-05-01)" with Layers 1-8 monotonically. Updated index entry to "eight-message chain extended 2026-05-01" + listed Layers 7+8 (LLMs in dev pipeline, convergent multi-round AI iteration). All threads resolved via GraphQL `resolveReviewThread` mutation. Auto-merge already armed on both PRs (re-armed by Aaron earlier). Cron 98fc7424 healthy. | [PR #1030: paired-edit-lint failure → fix pushed; auto-merge armed] / [PR #986: 6→0 unresolved threads, auto-merge armed] | Class-level lesson: **the same finding-class shows up in 3 different surfaces this tick** — claim/reality mismatch in claims about substrate's own structure. PR #1031 had it (the `[sic]` claim that wasn't satisfied). PR #986 has it twice (single-slot marker that wasn't single, "six" count that was actually "eight"). PR #1030 had a different shape (paired-edit lint flagging a drift between the file modification and the index it should have had — a structural promise the substrate makes about itself). All three trace back to the **verify-before-state-claim** discipline applied to file-internal metadata at authoring time. The meta-meta-meta-rule predicts these will keep showing up until the discipline is mechanized — task #350 (Otto-357 mechanized auditor) is the right venue; could extend to verify file-internal claims (count claims, slot-uniqueness claims, [sic] claims) at pre-commit. Backlog candidate but not filing this tick — task list already saturated. |