-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SIGTERM handling is now unrelated to fault tolerance #16501
Conversation
⚡ Required checks status: All passing 🟢Groups summary🟢 pytorch_lightning: Tests workflowThese checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Azure GPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Azure HPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Azure IPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Docs
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 mypy
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 installThese checks are required after the changes to 🟢 link-check
These checks are required after the changes to Thank you for your contribution! 💜
|
9afe053
to
9e85132
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM !
What does this PR do?
Fault-tolerance is composed of several items:
This PR changes (4) so it is not tied to the fault-tolerance feature, as it doesn't need to be and could be used for other purposes, or for manual fault-tolerance.
Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.
None
cc @Borda @carmocca @justusschock @awaelchli