Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - Add bonuses field to the new check feature #194

Open
4m2c4bl3 opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Feature Request - Add bonuses field to the new check feature #194

4m2c4bl3 opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@4m2c4bl3
Copy link
Contributor

4m2c4bl3 commented Jan 3, 2025

There are a few abilities in FU that apply specific bonuses to various checks.
Example from Orator:

In the base game, Focused gives a bonus of SL to checks done with it using INS + INS.
"When you perform an Open Check using 【INS + INS】, you gain a bonus equal to 【SL】 on that Check (this only applies to Open Checks)."

In the playtest material, Condemn functions as an opposed check, with a bonus to that check based on your SL.
"You gain a bonus equal to 【SL】 to your 【INS + WLP】 Checks for this Skill."

I'd love to be able to create easy rolls for my players using the new inline check tool done by @Azurelol. Right now they tend to just hit the dice button on their sheet, and then say out loud any bonuses they have to that.
For me to be able to implement this, the check tool would need an extra field in it for skill level bonuses. It makes the most sense to me to simply have an additional field where you can input a flat number bonus, and/or the new inline expressions.

Perhaps something like @CHECK[val1 val2 (bonusValues) optionalDL] ? This way the regex parser can take everything inside () to apply as the bonus, and we can use things like $sl*10, without worrying about spaces between the values, etc.

@Azurelol Azurelol self-assigned this Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants