You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#1982 introduced a site field to the Build type and a aggregate sites field to the Project type in our GraphQL schema. It would be helpful to also have a root-level sites field and a corresponding site field to allow API consumers to query sites across all projects they can see. The challenge with this is ensuring that consumers can only access sites which have contributed to projects they have access to, while also remaining efficient. Additional database indexes may be necessary to support this.
Feature Request
How can we make CDash better?
#1982 introduced a
site
field to theBuild
type and a aggregatesites
field to theProject
type in our GraphQL schema. It would be helpful to also have a root-levelsites
field and a correspondingsite
field to allow API consumers to query sites across all projects they can see. The challenge with this is ensuring that consumers can only access sites which have contributed to projects they have access to, while also remaining efficient. Additional database indexes may be necessary to support this.This work will assist with #1984.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: