You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm about to spend a lot of time re-writing R-code because the observations that have NA are different than the weights that have NA and I want all of them. One way to handle this is to have StatsModels take care of it when creating the model matrix.
It's been discussed a few times before (JuliaStats/StatsModels.jl#21). One alternative possibility would be to pass a symbol or string to the weights argument, and have a way to pass this to StatsModels when constructing the model matrix. We should settle this in StatsModels.
As mentioned in #341 ,
wts
is a bit esoteric and unclear. Better to useweights
as the name of the keyword argument forweights
.Let me know your thoughts on changing the name of keyword argument or if I should change the name of the field in
GlmResp
,LmResp
etc. as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: