-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"rationalize
" a rational
#43369
Comments
Hello, |
As you can see by the link just above your comment someone has already started to work on this. |
@fredrikekre Oh! Thanks...and sorry for the lame comment |
@dkarrasch I was just looking at this issue and it looks like you meant for it to be closed by #43427 |
This issue seems to have been resolved. I think it should be closed now |
Still fails. (waiting for #43427 to be merged)
|
I am sorry, I misinterpreted something. My bad. Is that PR still WIP? |
I don't think it is, so much as it's finished but hasn't been merged. |
It might be useful to have
rationalize(x)
returnx
ifx
is already rational, to allow generic code that takes both reals and rationals as inputs.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: