-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
minimum, maximum and extrema with specifing dims for an array that have all missing value dim doesn't work #35308
Comments
Note that
So this is just about the keyword argument for |
Good catch. I have an inefficient fix at #35323. An efficient one would take much more work. |
seems to be fixed by 76952a8 |
As noted at #35323, this isn't completely fixed unfortunately. See the note there:
|
nalimilan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 10, 2023
`v0 != v0` returns `missing` for missing values. Use the largest/smallest non-missing value to initialize the array. This is an inefficient approach. Faster alternatives would be to avoid using an initial value at all, and instead keep track of whether a value has been set in a separate mask; or to use `typemax`/`typemin` for types that support them. Fixes #35308.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
minimum
,maximum
andextrema
with specifingdims
for an array that have all missing value dim doesn't work.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: