We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmarking small array creation using ones (size 1 and 10) 0.6.4 vs. 1.0.3 suggests that it is about 15% slower in 1.0.
ones
julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 0.6.4 Commit 9d11f62bcb (2018-07-09 19:09 UTC) Platform Info: OS: macOS (x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7360U CPU @ 2.30GHz WORD_SIZE: 64 BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Haswell MAX_THREADS=16) LAPACK: libopenblas64_ LIBM: libopenlibm LLVM: libLLVM-3.9.1 (ORCJIT, broadwell) julia> @btime ones(1); 25.919 ns (1 allocation: 96 bytes) julia> @btime ones(10); 29.851 ns (1 allocation: 160 bytes)
julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 1.0.3 Commit 099e826241 (2018-12-18 01:34 UTC) Platform Info: OS: macOS (x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7360U CPU @ 2.30GHz WORD_SIZE: 64 LIBM: libopenlibm LLVM: libLLVM-6.0.0 (ORCJIT, skylake) julia> @btime ones(1); 30.834 ns (1 allocation: 96 bytes) julia> @btime ones(10); 34.186 ns (1 allocation: 160 bytes)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@vtjnash @JeffBezanson I am guessing there's not much to do here. Should we close? The performance here for 1.0.x and 1.6-master is the same.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Benchmarking small array creation using
ones
(size 1 and 10) 0.6.4 vs. 1.0.3 suggests that it is about 15% slower in 1.0.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: