-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate map!(f, A) (and asyncmap!(f, A)) for a cycle #19721
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sacha0
force-pushed
the
deptwoargmapbang
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 26, 2016 02:14
28c2b1d
to
acbfc5d
Compare
amitmurthy
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2016
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SharedArray changes seem fine.
Cheers, thanks for reviewing! |
Candidate for 0.6? Removing the [RFC] and tentatively adding to the 0.6 milestone. Best! |
Sacha0
changed the title
[RFC] Deprecate map!(f, A) (and asyncmap!(f, A)) for a cycle
Deprecate map!(f, A) (and asyncmap!(f, A)) for a cycle
Dec 29, 2016
In anticipation of changing map! and asyncmap!'s semantics such that they are consistent with map! and asyncmap! methods accepting more than two arguments, deprecate two-argument map! and asyncmap!.
tkelman
force-pushed
the
deptwoargmapbang
branch
from
December 30, 2016 18:31
b145fff
to
7bcc730
Compare
(Thanks for the rebase |
Thanks for reviewing / merging! |
JeffBezanson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2016
In anticipation of changing map! and asyncmap!'s semantics such that they are consistent with map! and asyncmap! methods accepting more than two arguments, deprecate two-argument map! and asyncmap!.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#12277 discusses the discrepancy between
map!(f, A)
(= map!(f, A, A))
andbroadcast!(f, A)
= (A <- [f() for a in A]
. Sentiment in #12277 leans towardsmap!(f, A)
andbroadcast!(f, A)
having consistent semantics, specificallybroadcast!(f, A)
's semantics for consistency withmap!
/broadcast!
methods accepting more arguments.As an experiment, this pull request deprecates
map!(f, A)
(and analogasyncmap!(f, A)
) in favor ofmap!(f, A, A)
(asyncmap!(f, A, A)
) such thatmap!(f, A)
's (asyncmap!(f, A)
's) semantics can change in a future release without silent breakage.Thoughts? Best!
(I expect the modification of
map!(f, A::SharedArray)
isn't quite correct. Someone with knowledge ofSharedArray
s should have a look at that.)