-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename rank one up- and downdate functions for Cholesky to rank(up/down)date #14424
Conversation
fcb89c0
to
3de9672
Compare
I dislike having the |
|
@jiahao I think it's pretty standard terminology for this operation, e.g. http://www.netlib.org/lapack/explore-html/d7/d15/group__double__blas__level2.html#ga35ca25bb135cd7bfdd5d6190b1aa4d07. @timholy I don't like the name. I consider myself in a process of removing the |
3de9672
to
aab1243
Compare
@andreasnoack I don't see how the LAPACK page you linked to substantiates this operation being called a "rank update". If anything, the documentation clearly describes a "rank 1" operation (the 1 is missing from the function name) and the notion of update is not described in the main documentation (only in the description of the arguments). Again, my point is that the phrase "rank update" is meaningless. "rank 1" is the adjectival phrase attached to "update"; "rank" itself cannot meaningfully describe any kind of update. That's why functions like "syrk" have the k - they are to describe operations dealing with "symmetric rank k" (the k cannot be omitted and still be a meaningful English phrase). How about |
I would even consider |
The |
But that's exactly my point regarding the name |
…/down)date Add NEWS.md entry
aab1243
to
cbf888e
Compare
After offline discussions, we have settled (locally) for |
Rename rank one up- and downdate functions for Cholesky to rank(up/down)date
No description provided.