You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fix ?(#TAB method search name exploration (#52555)
Fix#52551.
This PR ensures that a `SomeModule.?(...#TAB` completion can only
suggests method `foo` such that `SomeModule.foo` exists (by checking
`isdefined(SomeModule, :foo)`). This is equivalent, I believe, to the
initial implementation of #38791,
less the bug.
Now that we have #51345, we may want to relax the above condition
somewhat to include public names present in modules loaded into
`SomeModule`, so that, for instance, a direct completion of `?(` would
include `@assume_effects`. This could be good for method exploration
because even though typing `@assume_effects` with no qualification in
`Main` will error, the error now includes the helpful message
```
Hint: a global variable of this name also exists in Base.
```
But that can wait for a later PR anyway, this one is just the bugfix.
The bug mentioned at
#52551 (comment)
dates from the initial #38791 so this could be backported as far back as
v1.8.
---------
Co-authored-by: Shuhei Kadowaki <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit a987f56)
0 commit comments