You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found the support for the Hessenberg form of a matrix very useful. It would be also useful to have a similar support for the generalized Hessenberg form of a matrix pair. In this context, I have the following issue to raise to your attention.
Operations involving Hessenberg matrices and upper triangular matrices as addition and multiplications preserve the Hessenberg form. Thus if Ah is a Hessenberg matrix and At is an upper triangular matrix, then operations like αAh + βAt, At*Ah , Ah*At, At\Ah or Ah/At produce results which are Hessenberg matrices too. This feature is presently supported only for the addition with UniformScalings, i.e., Ah+βI results with Hessenberg shape. Surprisingly Ah*I does not result Hessenberg, although it trivially is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I found the support for the Hessenberg form of a matrix very useful. It would be also useful to have a similar support for the generalized Hessenberg form of a matrix pair. In this context, I have the following issue to raise to your attention.
Operations involving Hessenberg matrices and upper triangular matrices as addition and multiplications preserve the Hessenberg form. Thus if
Ah
is a Hessenberg matrix andAt
is an upper triangular matrix, then operations likeαAh + βAt
,At*Ah
,Ah*At
,At\Ah
orAh/At
produce results which are Hessenberg matrices too. This feature is presently supported only for the addition withUniformScalings
, i.e.,Ah+βI
results with Hessenberg shape. SurprisinglyAh*I
does not result Hessenberg, although it trivially is.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: