Skip to content

Better testing of SyntaxNode -> Expr conversion #120

@c42f

Description

@c42f

As exposed by #113, we had some unnecessary regressions due to the Expr conversion code being under-tested.

We need to make sure each branch in src/expr.jl is covered with the tests in test/expr.jl

[update] Some tests are now hosted in test/parser.jl, but it'd be better to move them into test/expr.jl and decouple them from the other tests, I think.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    intro issueGood issue to start contributing to JuliaSyntax

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions