Do we need to call it Star?

[elehcim]

I'm referring to

PhysicalParticles.jl/src/PhysicalParticle.jl

Line 349 in 3bb5227

struct Star{P, V, A, M, E, F, Et, D, dP, dE, Prs, T_1, I<:Integer} <: AbstractParticle3D

Would be something like Particle more appropriate?

[islent]

Data fields in Star are merely designed for Gadget-like gravitational force solver. If one is implementing a simple force solver, he might choose Ball::AbstractParticle3D:

struct Ball{P, V, A, M, I<:Integer} <: AbstractParticle3D
    Pos::PVector{P}
    Vel::PVector{V}
    Acc::PVector{A}
    Mass::M
    ID::I
end

GadgetParticle may be more appropriate :D

[elehcim]

GadgetParticle may be more appropriate :D
I agree :)

Ball::AbstractParticle3D is a good suggestion