-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
intellisence for entries in glossary #4472
Comments
Thanks for your feature request. Actually, this is not an intellisense issue as we already have auto-completion for many glossary commands, such as
I have just checked that our @LeoJhonSong Do you have a reference document (or link) listing the keywords we can expect in |
@jlelong really sorry for the late reply. Thank you for the feature in advance! The demo above is the fourth method to make a glossary in the manual for Do you have a reference document (or link) listing the keywords we can expect in
|
Nice work! I was just researching the same issue just to find it recently resolved. 🥳 |
Could we have intellisence for commands like
\gls{}
automatically completed with glossary entries stored in a.bib
file, just like intellisence for commands like\cite{}
?Thank you vert much for the powerful extension!
A demo is given below👇
main.tex >
symbols.bib >
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: