Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Case: Merging taxonomy terms referenced by Typed Relation fields #1619

Open
seth-shaw-unlv opened this issue Sep 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
Type: feature request a proposal for a new feature in the software (should be justified by a ‘use case’)

Comments

@seth-shaw-unlv
Copy link
Contributor

seth-shaw-unlv commented Sep 15, 2020

Sometimes a repository may end up with two taxonomy terms representing the same thing that should be merged (e.g. two terms for the same individual).

Currently, one would have to manually edit all repository items using the depreciated term to use the favored term. There is a module available, term_merge, for merging terms but it doesn't work for Typed Relation fields, only the core entity reference fields.

This limitation comes from it's dependency term_reference_change. To add support we would have to override their services for identifying reference fields and (possibly) merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: feature request a proposal for a new feature in the software (should be justified by a ‘use case’)
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants