You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
256 makes computation very slow, and this is larger than the typical number of effective intensity bins encountered in many images. A better default is 8, 10, 16?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related is the default range of the histogram. This defaults to the range of input pixel type. I think that reducing the size of the histogram may result in the all the intensities being in one bin for some common medical image modalities. Without adding a feature of automatically detecting the min/max of the input, it is risking producing constant images by default.
So I think this is a good idea. Along with adding a feature request for auto-range detection by default.
256 makes computation very slow, and this is larger than the typical number of effective intensity bins encountered in many images. A better default is 8, 10, 16?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: