Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

high severity in jsonwebtoken <=8.5.1 #222

Closed
huineng opened this issue Dec 22, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

high severity in jsonwebtoken <=8.5.1 #222

huineng opened this issue Dec 22, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@huineng
Copy link
Member

huineng commented Dec 22, 2022

i got this warning this morning

thanks

# npm audit report

jsonwebtoken  <=8.5.1
Severity: high
jsonwebtoken's insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hjrf-2m68-5959
jsonwebtoken vulnerable to signature validation bypass due to insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qwph-4952-7xr6
jsonwebtoken unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage  - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8cf7-32gw-wr33
jsonwebtoken has insecure input validation in jwt.verify function - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-27h2-hvpr-p74q
No fix available
node_modules/ibm-cloud-sdk-core/node_modules/jsonwebtoken
  ibm-cloud-sdk-core  >=0.3.0
  Depends on vulnerable versions of jsonwebtoken
  node_modules/ibm-cloud-sdk-core
    @ibm-cloud/cloudant  *
    Depends on vulnerable versions of ibm-cloud-sdk-core
    node_modules/@ibm-cloud/cloudant
@dpopp07
Copy link
Member

dpopp07 commented Dec 22, 2022

@huineng Thanks for the notice. I am seeing this as well. It looks like a new major release of jsonwebtoken may be required. I'm not sure yet what changes we'll need in our code to support that but I will start looking into it

@sjcotto
Copy link

sjcotto commented Dec 27, 2022

Hi, any news regarding this topic? it looks no major changes are needed

@TannerS
Copy link

TannerS commented Dec 27, 2022

Also wanted to check on this, due dates to fix deps which depend on this dep by januray 5th

@dpopp07
Copy link
Member

dpopp07 commented Dec 27, 2022

Hey all - this will be resolved in #225

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants