You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The fact lldb-18 didn't work with vscode is a bit of a background information / motivation on my part.
It's still strange this part of the formula is not built when versioned, when it did build for previous versions.
As an llvm developer and compiler engineer, it sure is interesting to be able to test and try lldb-17, just as much as we can with clang-17 and other llvm tools, in order to properly identify regressions and such.
We didn't build LLDB for llvm@17 to reduce the burden on our (limited, self-hosted) build infrastructure. And most users don't have as much need for older versions of LLDB.
But I'm happy to review a PR that returns LLDB to llvm@17's LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS configuration.
brew gist-logs <formula>
link ORbrew config
ANDbrew doctor
outputVerification
brew doctor
output saysYour system is ready to brew.
and am still able to reproduce my issue.brew update
and am still able to reproduce my issue.brew doctor
and that did not fix my problem.What were you trying to do (and why)?
I installed llvm@17 because vscode lldb plugin doesn't work with lldb 18.
What happened (include all command output)?
llvm@17 installation misses lldb binary and libraries.
What did you expect to happen?
llvm@17 should contain lldb.
Step-by-step reproduction instructions (by running
brew
commands)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: