chore: deploy Set it Free Loop (review tier, v2.0.0)

.gitattributes

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.github/workflows/*.lock.yml linguist-generated=true merge=ours

.github/aw/actions-lock.json

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "entries": {
+    "github/gh-aw-actions/setup@v0.83.4": {
+      "repo": "github/gh-aw-actions/setup",
+      "version": "v0.83.4",
+      "sha": "e89c65e17eb281bbd5ff2ff9e9199a03e96654c7"
+    }
+  }
+}

.github/workflows/sfl-pr-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+---
+description: |
+  Standalone full-spectrum pull request review triggered by the sfl-review
+  label. Performs security, correctness and reliability, and quality and
+  maintainability passes, posts one inline thread per finding, submits a
+  consolidated review, and publishes the SFL Reviewer Approval check.
+
+on:
+  pull_request:
+    types: [labeled]
+    names: [sfl-review]
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  pull-requests: read
+
+engine:
+  id: codex
+  env:
+    OPENAI_BASE_URL: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1
+    OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENROUTER_API_KEY }}
+
+model: moonshotai/kimi-k3?effort=high
+
+network:
+  allowed:
+    - openrouter.ai
+
+tools:
+  github:
+    toolsets: [pull_requests, repos]
+    github-app:
+      client-id: ${{ vars.SFL_APP_CLIENT_ID }}
+      private-key: ${{ secrets.SFL_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}
+
+safe-outputs:
+  github-app:
+    client-id: ${{ vars.SFL_APP_CLIENT_ID }}
+    private-key: ${{ secrets.SFL_APP_PRIVATE_KEY }}
+  create-pull-request-review-comment:
+    side: RIGHT
+    max: 20
+  submit-pull-request-review:
+    allowed-events: [APPROVE, REQUEST_CHANGES]
+    supersede-older-reviews: true
+    footer: always
+  create-check-run:
+    max: 1
+    name: "SFL Reviewer Approval"
+  remove-labels:
+    allowed: [sfl-review]
+    max: 1
+    target: triggering
+---
+# Deployed from: HemSoft/set-it-free-loop/deployment/workflows/sfl-pr-review.md@235a0df0c70fded4982e8763223e7c9936242215
+# To upgrade: re-run deploy-workflow.ps1 at the desired SHA
+
+<!-- sfl:
+  status: active
+  version: "1.0.0"
+  category: review
+  risk-class: trivial
+  target-labels: [sfl-review]
+  outcome-definition: |
+    The triggering pull request receives a current-head structured review,
+    one inline thread per finding, and an SFL Reviewer Approval check.
+  acceptance-criteria:
+    - The sfl-review label triggers exactly one current-head review run
+    - The trigger label is removed through App-authenticated safe outputs
+    - Security, correctness/reliability, and quality/maintainability are reviewed
+    - Every finding is an inline thread classified Critical, High, Medium, or Low
+    - The review body reports the run ID, head SHA, verdict, and severity counts
+    - Critical or High findings fail the approval check and request changes
+    - Medium or Low findings do not fail the approval check
+    - Zero findings produce an approving review and successful approval check
+  source-repo: HemSoft/set-it-free-loop
+-->
+
+# SFL Review - Full-Spectrum Pull Request Review
+
+Review only the pull request that triggered this workflow. The reviewed commit
+must be `${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}` and the SFL run ID is
+`${{ github.run_id }}`.
+
+Use the GitHub pull request tools to read the triggering PR, its changed files,
+and the complete diff. Before creating comments, list existing review comments
+and unresolved threads on the current head so you do not repeat a finding.
+
+## Required review passes
+
+Perform all three evidence-based passes independently before producing output.
+
+1. **Security**
+   - Injection, unsafe command or path construction, XSS, SSRF, and deserialization
+   - Authentication, authorization, privilege boundaries, and secret exposure
+   - Dependency, workflow, and supply-chain risks
+2. **Correctness and Reliability**
+   - Logic errors, regressions, incorrect assumptions, null and boundary cases
+   - Error handling, races, resource leaks, data loss, and compatibility
+   - Whether tests cover every meaningful new or changed behavior
+3. **Quality and Maintainability**
+   - Excessive complexity, duplication, coupling, unclear ownership, and dead code
+   - Type safety, performance regressions, operational risk, and repository conventions
+   - Whether the implementation is the smallest complete and defensible change
+
+## Finding policy
+
+Classify every finding into exactly one severity:
+
+- **CRITICAL** - exploitable security issue, data loss, production crash,
+  public API break, race, or deadlock
+- **HIGH** - serious correctness, authorization, reliability, or operational defect
+- **MEDIUM** - material bug avenue, missing logic-branch tests, performance
+  regression, or maintainability problem
+- **LOW** - actionable improvement with concrete value and low implementation risk
+
+Do not report style preferences, speculative concerns, or findings without
+specific evidence from the changed code.
+
+For each finding, call `create-pull-request-review-comment` on the most precise
+changed line. The comment body must begin with one of these exact prefixes:
+
+- `**CRITICAL Finding**`
+- `**HIGH Finding**`
+- `**MEDIUM Finding**`
+- `**LOW Finding**`
+
+After the prefix, state the defect, impact, evidence, and a concrete fix.
+Create exactly one inline thread per finding. If there are no findings, create
+no inline comments.
+
+## Approval policy
+
+Count all inline findings by severity.
+
+- If any Critical or High finding exists, submit `REQUEST_CHANGES` and create
+  the `SFL Reviewer Approval` check with conclusion `failure`.
+- If only Medium or Low findings exist, submit `APPROVE` and create the check
+  with conclusion `success`.
+- If no findings exist, submit `APPROVE` and create the check with conclusion
+  `success`.
+
+Submit exactly one consolidated review with this body:
+
+```markdown
+## SFL Full-Spectrum Review
+
+SFL run ID: ${{ github.run_id }}
+Head SHA: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
+Verdict: APPROVE
+
+| Severity | Count |
+| --- | ---: |
+| Critical | 0 |
+| High | 0 |
+| Medium | 0 |
+| Low | 0 |
+
+### Review passes
+
+- Security: complete
+- Correctness and Reliability: complete
+- Quality and Maintainability: complete
+
+### Summary
+
+Concise evidence-based summary of the review result.
+```
+
+Replace the verdict and counts with the actual result. Use
+`Verdict: CHANGES_REQUESTED` when Critical or High findings exist.
+
+Create exactly one check run named `SFL Reviewer Approval` with:
+
+- `title`: `SFL full-spectrum review complete`
+- `summary`: the verdict, head SHA, run ID, and severity counts
+- `conclusion`: the approval-policy result above
+
+After requesting the consolidated review and check run, call `remove-labels`
+for `sfl-review` on the triggering pull request. This must be the final safe
+output request so the label can be applied again for a later re-review.
+
+Do not modify code, branches, or pull request metadata. The only permitted
+label change is removing `sfl-review` through the configured safe output.

README.md

@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
 # PE-Bot (Performance Engineering Bot)
+[License information to be added]
+[![Set it Free Loop](https://img.shields.io/badge/dynamic/json?url=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2FHemSoft%2Fpe-bot%2Fmain%2Fsfl.json&query=%24.version&prefix=v&label=Set%20it%20Free%20Loop&color=FFD700&style=flat&logo=githubactions&logoColor=white)](https://github.com/HemSoft/set-it-free-loop)
+<!-- SFL_BADGE: auto-updated by deploy-workflow.ps1 -->
+# PE-Bot (Performance Engineering Bot)
 
 A specialized bot designed to assist with performance engineering tasks. This tool helps automate performance testing, analysis, and reporting processes.
 

sfl.json

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+{
+  "version": "2.0.0",
+  "deployedAt": "2026-08-02T01:36:28Z",
+  "tier": "review",
+  "source": "HemSoft/set-it-free-loop",
+  "sourceSha": "235a0df0c70fded4982e8763223e7c9936242215",
+  "components": [
+    "governance",
+    "labels",
+    "sfl-pr-review"
+  ],
+  "enginePolicy": {
+    "defaultProfile": "codex-gpt-55-high",
+    "workflows": [
+      {
+        "name": "sfl-pr-review",
+        "profile": "openrouter-kimi-k3-high",
+        "provider": "codex",
+        "model": "moonshotai/kimi-k3",
+        "effort": "high",
+        "renderedModel": "moonshotai/kimi-k3?effort=high",
+        "requiredSecretsAnyOf": [
+          "OPENROUTER_API_KEY"
+        ],
+        "environment": {
+          "OPENAI_BASE_URL": "https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
+          "OPENAI_API_KEY": "${{ secrets.OPENROUTER_API_KEY }}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}