You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello author, thank you very much for sharing your code. When I was reproducing these results, I encountered some problems and I hope you will give me the right guidance.
The main points of these problems are as follows:
why the starting sequence of E4B is "RQSQLAQDERVSRSYLALATETVDMFHILTKQVQKPFLRPELGPRLAAMLNFNLQQLCGPKCRDLKVTNPEKYGFEPKKLLDQLTDIYLQLDCARFAKAIAD", the sequence is completely different from the WT of E4B which is "IEKFKLLAEKVEEIVAKNARAEIDYSDAPDEFRDPLMDTLMTDPVRLPSGTVMDRSIILRHLLNSPTDPFNRQMLTESMLEPVPELKEQIQAWMREKQSSDH", why did the author use such a sequence?
2, When I use TAPE-E4B-Weight to score the newly generated sequence, the result is very poor, even using the original training data, the oracle does not fit very well.
I hope you can give me an answer, thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello author, thank you very much for sharing your code. When I was reproducing these results, I encountered some problems and I hope you will give me the right guidance.
The main points of these problems are as follows:
2, When I use TAPE-E4B-Weight to score the newly generated sequence, the result is very poor, even using the original training data, the oracle does not fit very well.
I hope you can give me an answer, thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: