Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why didnot the landscape of the TAPE-E4B-weight work well? #1

Open
huishao007 opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Why didnot the landscape of the TAPE-E4B-weight work well? #1

huishao007 opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@huishao007
Copy link

Hello author, thank you very much for sharing your code. When I was reproducing these results, I encountered some problems and I hope you will give me the right guidance.
The main points of these problems are as follows:

  1. why the starting sequence of E4B is "RQSQLAQDERVSRSYLALATETVDMFHILTKQVQKPFLRPELGPRLAAMLNFNLQQLCGPKCRDLKVTNPEKYGFEPKKLLDQLTDIYLQLDCARFAKAIAD", the sequence is completely different from the WT of E4B which is "IEKFKLLAEKVEEIVAKNARAEIDYSDAPDEFRDPLMDTLMTDPVRLPSGTVMDRSIILRHLLNSPTDPFNRQMLTESMLEPVPELKEQIQAWMREKQSSDH", why did the author use such a sequence?
    2, When I use TAPE-E4B-Weight to score the newly generated sequence, the result is very poor, even using the original training data, the oracle does not fit very well.
    I hope you can give me an answer, thank you very much!
@Stilwell-Git
Copy link
Contributor

Hello. We update the download_landscape.sh script. The issue should be fixed now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants