We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From Epic:
https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7-UK/UK-Core-Access/consumer.html
Why is Patient.Search relevant for the Consumer case? I wouldn't expect you'd ever want to give consumers much functional access to Patient.search.
Where does UK Core Access deviate from IPA? And why?
Add significant clarification around the authorization and data access expectations when using Patient.search in a Consumer context.
Please consider publishing the comparison results between UK Core and IPA as an addendum to the IG.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
From Epic:
Asset
https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7-UK/UK-Core-Access/consumer.html
Comment
Why is Patient.Search relevant for the Consumer case? I wouldn't expect you'd ever want to give consumers much functional access to Patient.search.
Where does UK Core Access deviate from IPA? And why?
Proposal
Add significant clarification around the authorization and data access expectations when using Patient.search in a Consumer context.
Please consider publishing the comparison results between UK Core and IPA as an addendum to the IG.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: