Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Style the keyword treeview section #4984

Closed
t-book opened this issue Oct 3, 2019 · 7 comments · Fixed by #4989
Closed

Style the keyword treeview section #4984

t-book opened this issue Oct 3, 2019 · 7 comments · Fixed by #4989
Assignees
Labels
frontend Issues regarding Frontend and styling minor A low priority issue which might affect only some users and /or not the main functionality
Milestone

Comments

@t-book
Copy link
Contributor

t-book commented Oct 3, 2019

The treeview plugin seems to miss styling. Icons are not rendern paddings look odd.

Bildschirmfoto 2019-10-03 um 12 04 26

@t-book t-book added the minor A low priority issue which might affect only some users and /or not the main functionality label Oct 3, 2019
@t-book t-book self-assigned this Oct 3, 2019
@t-book
Copy link
Contributor Author

t-book commented Oct 3, 2019

Will be:

Bildschirmfoto 2019-10-03 um 12 32 11

@t-book t-book added the frontend Issues regarding Frontend and styling label Oct 3, 2019
@t-book t-book changed the title Restyle the keyword treeview section Style the keyword treeview section Oct 3, 2019
@afabiani afabiani added this to the 2.10.1 milestone Oct 3, 2019
@gannebamm
Copy link
Contributor

Just an UX idea: Would be nice to type in the label and get autocomplete.

@t-book
Copy link
Contributor Author

t-book commented Oct 4, 2019

good point @gannebamm ! I will try to integrate it in a next step!

@capooti
Copy link
Member

capooti commented Oct 8, 2019

side note: would it be complicated to have facets count as we had in previous GeoNode versions (with taggit)?

@t-book
Copy link
Contributor Author

t-book commented Oct 8, 2019

@capooti Do you have something like this in mind? If so I think we just would have to update the api a bit.

Bildschirmfoto 2019-10-08 um 18 14 28

@capooti
Copy link
Member

capooti commented Oct 8, 2019

yes @t-book though I am not sure how performant is without a search engine, so maybe that should be optional?

@t-book
Copy link
Contributor Author

t-book commented Oct 8, 2019

so maybe that should be optional?

@capooti yep good idea!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
frontend Issues regarding Frontend and styling minor A low priority issue which might affect only some users and /or not the main functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants