We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be useful to expose something like llvm_field in the python interface.
An ideal test case would be extending this one
with another spec that uses a per-field constructor instead of the current struct operation.
Ideally we also show that we can specify only one of the structs in the record and leave the other unspecified as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that we should support this, although I think that's now the domain of galois-py-toolkit rather than this repo.
galois-py-toolkit
Sorry, something went wrong.
Now tracking here: GaloisInc/galois-py-toolkit#4
pnwamk
No branches or pull requests
It would be useful to expose something like llvm_field in the python interface.
An ideal test case would be extending this one
with another spec that uses a per-field constructor instead of the current struct operation.
Ideally we also show that we can specify only one of the structs in the record and leave the other unspecified as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: