Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation Automation [SPIKE] #984

Open
7 tasks
brian-ruf opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
7 tasks

Documentation Automation [SPIKE] #984

brian-ruf opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@brian-ruf
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a ...

research - something needs to be investigated

This relates to ...

  • the FedRAMP OSCAL baselines
  • the FedRAMP SSP OSCAL Example
  • the FedRAMP SAP OSCAL Example
  • the FedRAMP SAR OSCAL Example
  • the FedRAMP POA&M OSCAL Example
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Validations
  • the Not sure

User Story

As a maintainer and consumer of FedRAMP OSCAL guidance, documentation, examples, and rules, I want a mechanism that ties the examples, content, and rules together so that documentation can be generated more consistently with reduced manual effort.

This spike/research effort should explore the degree to which metaschema syntax can be used as the basis for keeping documentation consistent.

Goals

  • Create a proof-of-concept test that expands the use of the FedRAMP constraints and allowed values meta schema files as a specification and content for documentation.
  • If the concept is viable, but changes are needed to the metaschema syntax, define the needed changes.

Dependencies

existing metaschema syntax

Acceptance Criteria

Other information

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants