You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear author, I have a question regarding the multiphase number used in your study. Since the multiphase number can be set differently during training and significantly impacts the test results, could you kindly clarify the specific multiphase number you used during training to achieve the results reported in your paper?
In my own experiments, I observed some intriguing behaviors:
When using multiphase = 2 during training, the test results with inference = 1 are suboptimal, whereas inference = 2 produces much better outcomes.
However, training with multiphase = 1 yields good results when testing with inference = 1. Yet, this seems to forgo the benefits of your proposed method.
I would greatly appreciate your insights into this matter. Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear author, I have a question regarding the multiphase number used in your study. Since the multiphase number can be set differently during training and significantly impacts the test results, could you kindly clarify the specific multiphase number you used during training to achieve the results reported in your paper?
In my own experiments, I observed some intriguing behaviors:
When using multiphase = 2 during training, the test results with inference = 1 are suboptimal, whereas inference = 2 produces much better outcomes.
However, training with multiphase = 1 yields good results when testing with inference = 1. Yet, this seems to forgo the benefits of your proposed method.
I would greatly appreciate your insights into this matter. Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: