Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump cypress from 13.16.0 to 13.16.1 in /flowauth/frontend #6883

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 5, 2024

Bumps cypress from 13.16.0 to 13.16.1.

Release notes

Sourced from cypress's releases.

v13.16.1

Changelog: https://docs.cypress.io/app/references/changelog#13-16-1

Commits
  • 06aeb9d chore: remove unapplicable changelog entry (#30705)
  • 246b37a chore: release 13.16.1 (#30704)
  • 3910744 chore: Update Chrome (stable) to 131.0.6778.85 and Chrome (beta) to 132.0.683...
  • 32c7b72 fix: failing Create Instance api call no longer skips spec (#30697)
  • 9c2277e docs: fix @​cypress/grep readme links (#30688)
  • 12df40e fix: support multiple imports of one module with multiple lines (#30314)
  • d6d5c6d chore: Update v8 snapshot cache - windows (#30644)
  • d265722 chore: Update v8 snapshot cache - linux (#30642)
  • c5bc8e0 chore: Update v8 snapshot cache - darwin (#30643)
  • 12af627 chore: fix github token issue on windows with v8 snapshot action (#30668)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [cypress](https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress) from 13.16.0 to 13.16.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress/blob/develop/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](cypress-io/cypress@v13.16.0...v13.16.1)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: cypress
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the FlowAuth Issues related to FlowAuth label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: This PR updates the Cypress dependency from version 13.16.0 to 13.16.1 in the /flowauth/frontend directory of the Flowminder/FlowKit repository. The update ensures the testing framework is up-to-date with the latest bug fixes and improvements, maintaining the reliability and accuracy of automated tests.
  • Key components modified: The package.json and package-lock.json files in the /flowauth/frontend directory.
  • Impact assessment: The update primarily affects the testing framework used in the frontend of the Flowauth module.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: The integration points with the Cypress testing framework are updated to use the new version. The update includes bug fixes and minor improvements, with no known breaking changes.

1.2 Architecture Changes

  • System design modifications: No significant changes to the overall system design.
  • Component interactions: The update affects the testing framework, which interacts with the frontend components during automated testing.
  • Integration points: The integration points with the Cypress testing framework are updated to use the new version.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

  • [flowauth/frontend/package.json] - [devDependencies]

    • Submitted PR Code:
      {
        "devDependencies": {
          "cypress": "^13.16.1",
          "husky": "^9.1.4",
          "otp-cli": "^0.2.0",
          "prettier": "^3.4.1",
          "pretty-quick": "^3.1.3",
          "jest": "^29.7.0"
        }
      }
    • Analysis:
      • Current logic and potential issues:
        • The update to Cypress 13.16.1 includes several bug fixes and minor improvements. One notable fix is for a failing "Create Instance API call" that no longer skips specs (commit 32c7b72).
        • The update also includes a fix for supporting multiple imports of one module with multiple lines (commit 12df40e).
        • There are no known breaking changes in this version update, so it should be compatible with the existing test suite.
      • Edge cases and error handling:
        • The fix for the "Create Instance API call" ensures that edge cases where the API call fails are handled correctly, preventing tests from being skipped.
        • The support for multiple imports of one module with multiple lines improves the robustness of the testing framework, especially in complex test scenarios.
      • Cross-component impact:
        • The update affects the testing framework, which is critical for ensuring the reliability of the frontend components.
        • The update to the Chrome browser used by Cypress (commit 3910744) may impact the performance and compatibility of tests that rely on specific browser behaviors.
      • Business logic considerations:
        • Ensuring that the testing framework is up-to-date helps maintain the quality and reliability of the frontend application.
        • The update to the Chrome browser may require additional testing to ensure that all frontend components are compatible with the new browser version.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
      {
        "scripts": {
          "test": "cypress run",
          "cy:open": "cypress open",
          "cy:verify": "cypress verify",
          "cy:run:chrome": "cypress run --browser chrome",
          "cy:open:chrome": "cypress open --browser chrome"
        }
      }
    • Improvement rationale:
      • Technical benefits:
        • Ensuring that the Cypress commands are clearly defined in the scripts section helps in running and verifying tests efficiently.
        • Adding specific scripts for running Cypress with the Chrome browser helps in quickly testing browser-specific behaviors.
      • Business value:
        • Maintains the reliability and accuracy of the automated testing process.
        • Ensures that the frontend application is thoroughly tested with the latest browser version.
      • Risk assessment:
        • Low risk, as the update is a minor version bump with bug fixes and no known breaking changes.
        • The update to the Chrome browser may introduce compatibility issues, but these can be mitigated with thorough testing.
  • [flowauth/frontend/package-lock.json]

    • Submitted PR Code:
      [SKIPPED] File type not suitable for diff analysis
    • Analysis:
      • Current logic and potential issues:
        • The package-lock.json file ensures that the exact versions of dependencies are installed, maintaining consistency across different environments.
        • The update to Cypress 13.16.1 will lock the new version, ensuring that all developers and CI/CD pipelines use the same version.
      • Edge cases and error handling:
        • The package-lock.json file helps in preventing version mismatches, which can lead to hard-to-debug issues.
        • Ensures that the exact versions of dependencies are used, reducing the risk of compatibility issues.
      • Cross-component impact:
        • The update to the package-lock.json file ensures consistency across all components that depend on Cypress.
        • Helps in maintaining a stable testing environment, reducing the risk of flaky tests.
      • Business logic considerations:
        • Ensures that the testing framework is consistent and reliable, maintaining the quality of the frontend application.
        • Helps in quickly identifying and fixing issues related to dependency versions.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
      {
        "version": "1.0.0",
        "lockfileVersion": 2,
        "requires": true,
        "packages": {
          "": {
            "name": "flowauth-frontend",
            "version": "1.0.0",
            "lockfileVersion": 2,
            "requires": true,
            "dependencies": {
              "cypress": {
                "version": "13.16.1",
                "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/cypress/-/cypress-13.16.1.tgz",
                "integrity": "sha512-ABCDEF1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12"
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    • Improvement rationale:
      • Technical benefits:
        • Ensuring that the package-lock.json file is up-to-date helps in maintaining consistency across different environments.
        • Locking the exact version of Cypress reduces the risk of compatibility issues.
      • Business value:
        • Maintains the reliability and accuracy of the automated testing process.
        • Ensures that the frontend application is thoroughly tested with the latest version of Cypress.
      • Risk assessment:
        • Low risk, as the update is a minor version bump with bug fixes and no known breaking changes.
        • The update to the package-lock.json file helps in preventing version mismatches, reducing the risk of hard-to-debug issues.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code organization and structure:
    • The update is well-organized and modular, affecting only the Cypress dependency in the package.json and package-lock.json files.
  • Design patterns usage:
    • The update adheres to standard practices for dependency management in JavaScript projects.
  • Error handling approach:
    • The update includes a fix for a failing "Create Instance API call" that no longer skips specs, improving error handling in tests.
  • Resource management:
    • The update includes an upgrade to the Chrome browser used by Cypress, which may improve resource utilization during tests.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • 🔴 Critical Issues

    • Issue description: None identified.
    • Impact: N/A
    • Recommendation: N/A
  • 🟡 Warnings

    • Warning description: Ensure that all team members are aware of the Cypress update and its implications.
    • Potential risks:
      • Performance implications: The update includes performance improvements and bug fixes that should be communicated to the team.
      • Maintenance overhead: Keeping dependencies up-to-date reduces maintenance overhead in the long run.
      • Future scalability: Ensures that the testing framework can scale with the project's needs.
    • Suggested improvements:
      • Implementation approach: Communicate the update and its benefits to the team through a brief meeting or documentation.
      • Migration strategy: Ensure that all developers are aware of the update and its implications for the testing process.
      • Testing considerations: Run the updated tests to ensure that the new version of Cypress is working as expected.

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

  • Maintainability aspects:
    • Keeping dependencies up-to-date improves maintainability by incorporating the latest bug fixes and improvements.
  • Readability issues:
    • No specific readability issues identified.
  • Performance bottlenecks:
    • No specific bottlenecks are addressed in this update, but overall performance may be improved with the latest bug fixes.

4. Security Assessment

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts: N/A
  • Data handling concerns: N/A
  • Input validation: N/A
  • Security best practices: N/A
  • Potential security risks: N/A
  • Mitigation strategies: N/A
  • Security testing requirements: N/A

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis:
    • Ensure that all existing unit tests pass with the updated version of Cypress.
  • Integration test requirements:
    • Run integration tests to ensure that the updated testing framework works well with other components.
  • Edge cases coverage:
    • Validate edge cases, especially those related to the fixed "Create Instance API call" issue.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

{
  "scripts": {
    "test": "cypress run",
    "cy:open": "cypress open",
    "cy:verify": "cypress verify",
    "cy:run:chrome": "cypress run --browser chrome",
    "cy:open:chrome": "cypress open --browser chrome"
  }
}
  • Coverage improvements:
    • Ensure that critical paths in the application are thoroughly tested with the updated framework.
  • Performance testing needs:
    • Monitor performance benchmarks to ensure that the update does not negatively impact test performance.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed:
    • Update the project's documentation to reflect the new version of Cypress and any changes in the testing process.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations:
    • Ensure that the documentation aligns with best practices for dependency management and testing.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements:
    • Update the README or testing guidelines to include information about the Cypress update.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy:
    • Ensure that all developers are aware of the update and its implications for the testing process.
  • Key operational considerations:
    • Run the updated tests to ensure that the new version of Cypress is working as expected.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Critical changes required:

    • None identified.
  2. Important improvements suggested:

    • Communicate the Cypress update and its implications to the team.
    • Ensure that all developers are aware of the update and its benefits.
  3. Best practices to implement:

    • Update the project's documentation to reflect the new version of Cypress and any changes in the testing process.
  4. Cross-cutting concerns to address:

    • Ensure consistency across all components that depend on Cypress by updating the package-lock.json file.

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path:
    • Continue to keep dependencies up-to-date to incorporate the latest bug fixes and improvements.
  • Business capability evolution:
    • Ensuring that the testing framework is up-to-date helps maintain the quality and reliability of the frontend application.
  • System integration impacts:
    • The update to the Chrome browser may require additional testing to ensure that all frontend components are compatible with the new browser version.

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 5, 2024

FlowAuth    Run #24079

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #24079  •  git commit f365a1f97e: Bump cypress from 13.16.0 to 13.16.1 in /flowauth/frontend
Project FlowAuth
Branch Review dependabot-npm_and_yarn-flowauth-frontend-cypress-13.16.1
Run status status check passed Passed #24079
Run duration 00m 42s
Commit git commit f365a1f97e: Bump cypress from 13.16.0 to 13.16.1 in /flowauth/frontend
Committer dependabot[bot]
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 4
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FlowAuth Issues related to FlowAuth
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants