You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your excellent work. I use the pdb.m script the compute the distribution of the pose coefficients of the 300W fullset. But the posePara is between 0.1184 and 776.2491(I choose the first dim of the COEFF as the poseEig), this result looks weird because the result on the AFLW is between 0.0028 and 94.8463. And I want to know why the value of x-axis in Figure5 shown in your paper is between -80 and 80. Waiting for your reply。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your excellent work. I use the pdb.m script the compute the distribution of the pose coefficients of the 300W fullset. But the posePara is between 0.1184 and 776.2491(I choose the first dim of the COEFF as the poseEig), this result looks weird because the result on the AFLW is between 0.0028 and 94.8463. And I want to know why the value of x-axis in Figure5 shown in your paper is between -80 and 80. Waiting for your reply。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: