We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As noted in #4 the buffer/FIFO sizing is inconsistent and likely buggy/non-optimal and is difficult to understand. Thank you
#Updates Needed
DEFINES: TX_PACKET_LEN 61 RX_PACKET_LEN 61 RX_PKT_HANDLE_APPEND_LEN 2 RF_DATALINK_PACKET_PAYLOAD_LEN 62 RF_DATALINK_PACKET_RX_FOOTER_LEN 2 Variables: tx_buffer[62]; FIFOS: rf_datalink_tx_fifo_buffer[RF_DATALINK_PACKET_PAYLOAD_LEN*RF_DATALINK_PACKET_FIFO_COUNT] = 62*x bytes rf_datalink_rx_fifo_buffer[(RF_DATALINK_PACKET_PAYLOAD_LEN+RF_DATALINK_PACKET_RX_FOOTER_LEN)*RF_DATALINK_PACKET_FIFO_COUNT] = 64*x bytes Functions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kb1lqd
No branches or pull requests
As noted in #4 the buffer/FIFO sizing is inconsistent and likely buggy/non-optimal and is difficult to understand. Thank you
#Updates Needed
Baseline Summary
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: