Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal for L3VPN tunnel encapsulation #3574

Closed
pguibert6WIND opened this issue Jan 7, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Proposal for L3VPN tunnel encapsulation #3574

pguibert6WIND opened this issue Jan 7, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@pguibert6WIND
Copy link
Member

This ticket is here to specify what would be the vty command look like, if someone wanted to rely on rfc5512.

vty example would rely on a locally configured interface.
this could be done by using route-map.

route-map rmap_to_apply_at_output 1
 set ip next-hop encapsulate l3vpn <InterfaceNAME>
 set ip[v6] next-hop encapsulate l3vpn <InterfaceNAME>
exit
@rwestphal
Copy link
Member

Quick note: there's a draft [1] proposing to obsolete RFC 5512, and I believe this draft is on its way to be approved. It would probably be a good idea to take a look at this draft before doing any work based on RFC 5512.

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants