Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bfd for static routes #3369

Closed
ak503 opened this issue Nov 21, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

bfd for static routes #3369

ak503 opened this issue Nov 21, 2018 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ak503
Copy link
Contributor

ak503 commented Nov 21, 2018

Are you planning bfd for static routes?

@qlyoung qlyoung added the question Not a bug label Nov 21, 2018
@donaldsharp
Copy link
Member

Can you give a description of what you actually would like to do here? As that I do not understand this request

@bodleytunes
Copy link

@ak503 ak503 closed this as completed Nov 28, 2018
@ak503 ak503 reopened this Nov 28, 2018
@ak503
Copy link
Contributor Author

ak503 commented Nov 28, 2018

closed by mistake. reopen

@rzalamena
Copy link
Member

I don't think anyone has plans for this at the moment, at least there is no public manifestation.

I'm adding this to the feature request page and closing the issue ( https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/wiki/Feature-Requests ).

@33Fraise33
Copy link

Hi,

What is the latest statest on this?
There are multiple pull requests: #7101 #9704 #10230
But there seems to be no more information on this?
For use with Nokia Airscale which only supports bfd as a "routing protocol" this would be a handy feature to have physical interface failover.

@pguibert6WIND
Copy link
Member

@33Fraise33 , #10230 is the latest one.
when you talk about interface failover, can you please describe more your use case please?

@33Fraise33
Copy link

@33Fraise33 , #10230 is the latest one. when you talk about interface failover, can you please describe more your use case please?

Yes I can.
We are an ISP/MSP in Belgium working together with Nokia for 5G deployments. Their Airscale radio product has no support for dynamic routing but support BFD on static routes.

We create 2 interfaces each with a vlan on it towards the radio. On each transit we have a bfd session on the static route. If the bfd session fails the other route is being used. The same at the Airscale side (they use a trigger for that).
This way we can have failover even if the transit is not directly terminated on the physical switch connected to the radio.

I hope this makes things a little bit more clear.

@ton31337
Copy link
Member

Done by #12424.

@ton31337 ton31337 added the bfd label May 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants