Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identify proteomics Minimum Information #31

Open
mcourtot opened this issue Jul 10, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Identify proteomics Minimum Information #31

mcourtot opened this issue Jul 10, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Resolute Issue associated with RESOLUTE project Task 2.1 Workflow

Comments

@mcourtot
Copy link
Collaborator

Is there an existing MI for proteomics data that we can assess resolute against? Goal is to provide a wish list metadata for upcoming datasets

@mcourtot mcourtot added Resolute Issue associated with RESOLUTE project Workflow labels Jul 10, 2019
@mcourtot mcourtot added this to the F2F meeting October 2019 milestone Jul 10, 2019
@FuqiX FuqiX self-assigned this Sep 18, 2019
@mcourtot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Check ontology recommendation (eg Brenda mentioned by @proccaserra)

@proccaserra
Copy link
Collaborator

proccaserra commented Oct 16, 2019

@sedlyarov @mcourtot @FuqiX
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/help/archive/submission/pridexml

Section 6: Recommendations on Ontology Use -> PRIDE requires BRENDA for annotation Source/specimen describe which differs from ArrayExpress or ENA (EFO, free text respectively)

TODO: Documenting Requirements and Use case: Ontology Mapping BRENDA <-> EFO
related to:

@FuqiX
Copy link
Collaborator

FuqiX commented Jan 15, 2020

@ulo and @sedlyarov submitted the proteomics dataset to Proteomexchange/PRIDE with right format and annotation. Links will be added later

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Resolute Issue associated with RESOLUTE project Task 2.1 Workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants