Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions about DFT calculation of OMat24 #1071

Closed
hexagonrose opened this issue Mar 20, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

Questions about DFT calculation of OMat24 #1071

hexagonrose opened this issue Mar 20, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@hexagonrose
Copy link

What would you like to report?

Hello! I'm interested in fine-tuning the pretrained model trained with OMat24.
I'm working on creating my own fine-tuning dataset and would like to know the precise DFT calculation settings used for OMat24 to ensure compatibility.

  1. The version of VASP and pymatgen?
  2. As fas as I know, it's better to use ISMEAR=0 to metallic systems. But, MPRelaxSet makes INCAR with ISMEAR=-5 for metallic systems. When performing the calculations, was there anything changed in the input file created by MPRelaxSet other than the ALGO parameter?
@lbluque
Copy link
Collaborator

lbluque commented Mar 21, 2025

Hi @hexagonrose,

  1. We used VASP 6.3.2
  2. Apart from the ALGO parameters we used VASP 54 pseudopotentials (this is the most important to ensure compatibility). We did run ISMEAR=-5 for metals, but you are correct ISMEAR=0 is more appropriate for metallic systems.

Note that you do not have to necessarily match the exact settings if you are going to fine-tune. For example finetuning with MPTrj gives very accurate models for the MPTrj settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants