Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How do users change SSP AF forcing to something custom? #329

Open
ekluzek opened this issue Mar 11, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

How do users change SSP AF forcing to something custom? #329

ekluzek opened this issue Mar 11, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
answers are bfb CESM Only enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested Responsibility: CTSM Responsibility to manage and accomplish this issue is the CTSM Software group

Comments

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Mar 11, 2025

With #292 the default for users setting up SSP cases will be to use AF for that SSP. I'm not sure if they can easily change this to something else? And for that matter is that something that we need to support or think about?

I don't think it allows the user to change it to something else though. Which might be something users might want to do? But, I'll turn that question into an issue so we can discuss, and decide if it should come in or not.

Originally posted by @ekluzek in #292 (comment)

@ekluzek ekluzek added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested CESM Only answers are bfb Responsibility: CTSM Responsibility to manage and accomplish this issue is the CTSM Software group labels Mar 11, 2025
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Mar 11, 2025

@samsrabin what are your thoughts here? Can this be done, and if so how? And is it important enough to allow a way to do it?

@samsrabin
Copy link
Contributor

People will want to mix-and-match scenario land use timeseries and climate forcings—e.g., running SSP5-8.5 climate with SSP1-2.6 land use. However, they could do that by requesting an SSP585 compset and then pointing flanduse_timeseries at the SSP126 file. So I'm not sure this is important.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
answers are bfb CESM Only enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested Responsibility: CTSM Responsibility to manage and accomplish this issue is the CTSM Software group
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants