Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposed improvements to RepoToTextForLLMs #9

Open
pma1999 opened this issue Jul 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Proposed improvements to RepoToTextForLLMs #9

pma1999 opened this issue Jul 25, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@pma1999
Copy link

pma1999 commented Jul 25, 2024

Hello,

I have been working with RepoToTextForLLLMs and I have made some improvements that I would like to share:

  1. multi-branch support: now the script can download and process all branches from a repository (user can choose).
  2. Better handling of binary and large files: Detection and handling of these types of files has been improved.

I have uploaded these improvements to my GitHub (it's in private, as I don't want to steal credit for your work, but I have given you access): Hello,

I have been working with RepoToTextForLLLMs and I have made some improvements that I would like to share:

  1. multi-branch support: now the script can download and process all branches from a repository (user can choose).
  2. Better handling of binary and large files: Detection and handling of these types of files has been improved.

I have uploaded these improvements to my GitHub (it's in private, as I don't want to steal credit for your work, but I have given you access): https://github.com/pma1999/RepoToTextForLLMs-Improved.

There are some additional issues that I have identified but have not yet implemented:

  • The progress bar currently shows progress by branch, resulting in infrequent updates for repositories with few branches.
  • It would be beneficial to implement a system to reference identical files between branches, avoiding duplication and saving tokens.

I would be happy to discuss these improvements and possible future collaborations.

Regards,
Pablo.

@lord-dubious
Copy link

can iv see

@ubranch
Copy link

ubranch commented Aug 26, 2024

can you share?

@JoaGamo
Copy link

JoaGamo commented Sep 26, 2024

bruh u serious. Share your changes or, if you don't want to steal credit as that's reasonable, create a pull request

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants